Pros
Good benefits and the opportunity to work with very intelligent people.
Cons
While I’m sure the current manager of the administrative team was an excellent assistant, that doesn’t necessarily mean she possesses the qualities and tools required to effectively manage a team of assistants. It’s evident that the company has not adequately prepared her for this role—perhaps some training would prove beneficial. Her management style has fostered favoritism, which, though it may seem harmless, often disguises deeper issues of discrimination and inequity. She frequently used 1:1 meetings to gather information about colleagues and seemed to encourage competition among us. Whether through direct accusations or subtle suggestions, she appeared all too eager to plant seeds of discord. This behavior within the team was not only tolerated but encouraged and rewarded, leading to a "Mean Girl" culture that is sanctioned at the managerial level. Her vindictive nature is so well-known that even the investment staff warns newcomers of it. In addition, she often rolled out superficial initiatives, seemingly more concerned with checking boxes for her yearly review than with genuine employee development. These initiatives typically lacked substance and failed to address the real needs of the team, leaving many feeling undervalued and patronized. As for the firm itself, it exhibits a significant lack of diversity and fails to ensure equitable treatment between investment staff and non-investment staff. The investment team often receives preferential treatment and opportunities, while the rest of the staff is left feeling marginalized. The firm prides itself on being "traditional," but in reality, this approach is simply outdated and out of touch with the needs of a modern workforce.