employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Population Services International

Is this your company?

Population Services International reviews

3.9

77% would recommend to a friend

(378 total reviews)
avatar

Karl Hofmann

90% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

Population Services International has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 378 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Population Services International employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

378 reviews
1.0
Oct 14, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None. PSI is a H.O.R.R.I.B.L.E place to work. After the initial “high” of working for a company that is apparently known for “getting stuff done” you realize it’s a soul sucking, inefficient, racist, colonizing institution with no intention of changing. C Suite, when are you going to do something about it? Thanks for the 1:1s and the “open door policy” but how many Glassdoor or Ethics Review Point submissions do you need? You did an internal anonymous review and completely disregarded and invalidated all of our concerns. The results clearly show that we are unhappy, have low morale, and are tired of poor management. Your response- “I know you’re unhappy because we just renovated the office and change is hard” like we’re all 4 years olds. What a slap in the face. If you want to join PSI after reading this, my only advice is that the NBD and LAC/Asia teams are the only two that seem to be happy. LAC/Asia team doesn’t go a day without praising their Sr. Regional Director to literally anyone who will listen. Staff on both teams get awesome opportunities! The east africa team was also good before it merged.

Cons

Pay is an absolute insult. Those who started at PSI in its heyday are the folks who get promoted to Director of [random new department that does nothing] or VP on a given Tuesday, but PSI “can’t afford” offer junior/ newly mid-level staff a living wage for DC. The number of staff that have second or third jobs is exorbitant. My favorite part of the year is when the director, excuse me I mean VP, sends an email encouraging us to fill out our time sheet with our “true” hours worked. PSI works people to death. Burnout is real. The two people at PSI who basically took it upon themselves to keep morale up left with no jobs lined up. That should tell you something. · Bureaucracy! You can’t get anything done without passing it through 50 people to “chime in”. We get nowhere because everyone wants to be involved but no one wants to push it to the finish line. They just complain and/or spend 4 months saying they’ll read it, get to it a year later and then decide we should go in a completely different direction. This is why we go nowhere. · PSI is racist, xenophobic, and patriarchal, and it’s time that this is called out and addressed. There’s a particular department where most of their junior-newly mid-level staff were people of color and guess what… they’ve all left due to the covert and blatant racism within the department and organization. One intern in particular said “PSI is not a place for women of color” when she left which was painful to hear because the whole point of this DISGRACE of an organization is to empower women of color, yet the ones working here have to leave because it's RACIST and their mental health is at stake. White privilege is so rampant here and that’s probably why the one time we got a black C-Suite member (who we all LOVED) she ran out of here in less than 4 months. They just wanted her to clean up the mess they had made. People of color here get paid less than everyone else in their position or the ones who start with less experience and/or education. Their ideas aren’t heard. They’re looked over constantly and told to wait indefinitely for opportunities that white staff just demand and receive. They can’t advocate for themselves without their team saying they’re “angry” “aggressive” “bringing down the vibe”, etc. And worst of all, they’re only brought into the room when a donor is visiting and it’s glaringly obvious that their team is completely white. I can’t even call out a department here but it’s ALL of them that do this! Then they disguise it as an opportunity for you to grow meanwhile they’ve shot down all of your requests for real professional development all year. POCs at PSI are tokens and that’s it. · The silos make it hard to work in-country and on the PMTs (regional HQ teams). Certain projects (cough cough FP) REFUSE to understand that they are NOT THE ONLY PROJECT these countries have and impose insane deadlines and timelines as if they pay for 100% of our time. Then their teams send passive aggressive or just plain INSULTING emails to PMTs and country staff, call us incompetent behind our backs and chastise our in-country staff for not understanding their kindergarten level, google translate French and Spanish. Or they get upset when no one in-country wants to participate in their silly extracurricular “initiatives” and “challenges” they do to keep themselves busy because they dump all the REAL work on the PMTs. PMTs get no contact with the donor but we’re chastised when our funding gets cut or bids don’t get won but the teams who actually work directly with the donor are consoled by their directors when they can’t even perform simple stakeholder engagement. · Management is so bad it’s scary. Managers are evaluated without input from their supervisees. 50% of your job is to supervise someone and yet that person isn’t included in evaluations – ridiculous. How does that contribute to building capacity? How does that support any staff? Just because someone has the title of manager it does not mean that they are a good manager. We just started a year-long program called “Great Manager’s Training” that is completely useless. It takes a year to figure out that you shouldn't bully your staff? Sr level managers (several who have already taken this training) berate and scream at their staff and give opportunities to only the people who kiss up to them or ignore the abuse. Newly minted managers treat their interns and program assistants like their house-keepers/personal secretaries and as a manager myself it’s so sad to watch. If your manager wants you out, they will find a way to put you on a performance improvement plan (PIP)—which heads up is PSI’s way of kicking you out, but legally. (Looking at you WCA/Global Fund Unit! The fact that people can count how many people of color you’ve bullied and pushed out of your department alone, you should be ashamed). Want a promotion? Get in line. If your manager doesn’t like you, you’re screwed. If your manager likes you but doesn’t want to advocate for you. You’re screwed. If your manager likes you, but no one likes your manager… You’re screwed. Think it’s a good idea to go to HR? Ha! Anything that involves HR is pure unfiltered trash. So yes ladies, gents, and non-binaries you’re ... you guessed it … SCREWED. There are also certain managers who don’t want you to grow before they do, so they stifle your opportunities. · A number of senior level people are paid 100K+ to work remotely in low cost of living cities as we struggle to keep our head above water in DC with wages for people with masters starting at 40K. Interns to APMs are often running out of work by 4:45pm to make their next shift at some bar, restaurant, yoga studio, etc. But will be online at 10pm to continue working on things way above their pay grade. As a PM, I try to advocate for my junior staff but conversations with HR go nowhere. I've even had to help another staff find a higher paying job because they couldn't afford cost of living. · PSI loves the word “strategy” and does not understand what this entails. We have a new one every week. We spend months throwing buzz words and spend 1000s of dollars sending people abroad to roll out the new strategy of the month that no one understands. People that have no sense of cultural competency and yell at field staff or don't even know how to communicate with "those people" (as they say). They say that the countries are always behind, but HQ never involves them in anything, nothing is ever translated into their languages (especially our Portuguese staff) and instead of the 3 year roll out process at HQ, country staff get a 3 day workshop with a facilitator that has a 1st grade understanding of Spanish/French, an hour Skype for Business phone call where the first 59 minutes we're trying to connect, and an email that promises more information about the "strategy" that will never come. But the problem is definitely "them" being difficult not HQ, right? The xenophobia is striking. · They have entire project teams serving Africa, Asia, and LAC with NO team members who are African, Asian, or Latinx. And when they do have them, they fly out the door after they realize what kind of place PSI is). As a POC, if you speak up or have an opinion you are considered aggressive. If a white person does it, it’s more “Jane has so much initiative! What an asset to the team.” If a POC questions anything or advocates for anything they are “too direct”, “childish”, or “emotional” even. They even have to apologize to white staff for their white tears. But when a white person does it and is even seen among other staff as being rude or condescending, senior staff see it as “Adam is a leader… haha he’s so blunt and direct but that’s just his nature!” · Work life balance does not exist and is looked down upon. Unless you’re a director/VP because they’re on vacation 6 months out of the year. Oops, I mean “speaking” at a “conference”. · PSI rolled out a salary matrix almost 2 years ago and HR still can’t explain it. They claim that they do equity reviews to ensure equality across gender and individual experience but they pick the lowest starting number for every position. (Except if you are male.) There is no negotiation…unless you have a manager that is willing to fight for you, but as I mentioned before that is usually never the case. · If you decide to work at PSI, after a couple months the initial excitement disappears because you realize there is no sense of knowledge management. You are basically starting from scratch. There is inadequate training, superficial introductory meetings and no follow up. All the turn over isn’t helping either. Every week there is a ridiculously cringy email of someone thanking PSI for their time (read: burn out) and to please keep in touch (No thanks.)

1.0
Dec 10, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to get an understanding of public health and development work. I’ve made lifetime friendship with some amazing people! That and the drive and passion that unites all of us is why I stay, and I suspect it’s the same for many others. Would I recommend it to friends? Few departments, yes. Others, I wouldn’t recommend to my worst enemy

Cons

Grab a cuppa because there is unfortunately a bunch: Take heed and believe when other reviewers say there is a propensity to bully: there are instances of blatant bullying that’s I’ve witnessed and experienced myself, and absolutely nothing was done. Higher ups witness it as well and pretend to not see anything, complaints are tossed out and you’re made to feel like you’re the issue. There are departments (certain regional department - ask around there is one that is know as the problem child) where staff get fired, reprimanded or ridiculed for making the same errors that others in other departments have made countless times with no consequences. Junior staff are treated like dog doodoo on the sole of middle to upper management. You are underpaid but overworked and on top of that there is an instilled fear of losing your job They’ll work you like a mule only to blame you for their errors and take ownership of your successes Your manager makes your career – you will have some managers (claps for Southern Africa and East Africa) who are so involved into your professional growth and make sure there is equity in opportunities awarded to all their supervisees. Then there are the mean managers (clap for yourselves, you know who you are) – If you have one of those, they will break you, make you feel worthless, undervalued and underappreciated, etc. God forbid they’re with the in crowd! Basic criteria for promotion or advancement is to agree with them blindly – How dare you have you own opinions on anything! Managers often time have not received training on how to be a great leader, they have zero knowledge of people management and are not required to learn Supervisee opinions on their supervisors are not asked, talk less of taken into consideration. In the 3 years I’ve worked here, I have been asked just once about a supervisor’s performance. And even that was useless as said supervisor was able to strike down any negative feedback on their performance. There is supposedly a non-retaliation policy that is complete doodoo, a sad sad joke – every complain, supposedly confidential will get discovered (because HR… sigh... that’s another point I’ll make below) and you will be retaliated against. HR is truly the biggest joke – there is no privacy or confidentiality whatsoever, and they end up getting you in more trouble than you were before you reached out to them to help. Case in point: junior staff complains about bullying manager, not long after, HR calls meeting with staff and said manager about Manager’s sudden complain about staff performance, staff gets reprimanded for poor performance, staff gets fired for poor performance. Staff if fired without once having a separate conversation to delve into bullying and manager never once gets a talk to about bullying. Manager is still employed by the way and situation is repeating. Someone else mentioned the rampant toxic environment at PSI – I wholeheartedly agree. the only thing I disagree about is the it being most prevalent in Senior managers and director levels. This starts with managers, who play the blame game and are quick to throw their subordinates under the bus and/or encourage their subordinates to throw each other under the bus! This is even more so intense at the senior manager and director level. Lots of turnover – every day a new person, new eager faces are introduced to you. It’s sad to see how those eager faces change in the course of the year, if they last that long. Up until a couple of months ago, there wasn’t an onboarding process! I know! Unbelievable but true! It’s a baptism by fire here meaning you’re thrown into a burning building your first day and expected to come out victorious. There’s actual shock when you fail at something you were never trained on! and you’re given looks for asking things you’re supposed to know but didn’t. The systems are totally out of date – like we’re literally just now getting excited about SharePoint for example when others have been using it for years and have even moved on. PSI is king of reinventing themselves – same old outdated ideas covered up with shiny brand-new names and taglines. Also great at putting band aids to cover up infected wounds. Recently made changes to the names of regions we operate in, a whole overhaul of portfolios and such, as if that would solve the deeper issues staff deal with. It’s the biggest waste of funds, the biggest joke between staff and the topic for water cooler conversations. Feedback on performance varies greatly depending on your department! There are different standards for performance for the same roles. Feedback isn’t given in a constructive manner – if the goal is to help you grow and develop professionally, there should be an emphasis on this. But there isn’t, as such it’s hard to further your career goals or feel empowered If you are interested in a technical position, try to get your foot in the door as such rather than getting in through a regional department. It’s very hard to match the switch and you’ll be stuck with admin work. It’s common practice to have people with MPHs doing admin work. I personally know one who escaped West and Central Africa for a position with a core technical team. As they put it, it required herculean efforts and years of being unhappy and unfulfilled. Salaries for entry/mid level staff are not on part with similar organizations – it’s clear you don’t work for a non-profit to makes big bucks – not this is not the case for upper management and C-Suite. We had an intern send a company-wide email asking for people’s leftovers, that tells all.

2.0
Aug 21, 2020

Consider Your Options

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good healthcare benefits, half day Fridays in the summer, flexible work from home policy, great friendships, solid Mission.

Cons

Leadership regularly brings up low morale, low pay, long hours, bullying, toxic work environment, complete and total lack of HR in staff meetings but when it comes to making changes that would help address the root of the issue nothing meaningful is done. At first it was refreshing to see the CEO talking openly about these issues but years later I am just tired. Once leadership collected feedback but in the meeting to discuss the results we were told that none of the reasons we cited were accurate—we were not upset because of pay, burnout, toxic work culture—but because of office renovations. The conversation ended there. When employees expressed anxiety over job security (low cash problems due to COVID/bad management). Leadership’s response was to cut the conversation short saying we ‘should be adults’ when talking about these uncertainties. The message was clear ‘don’t complain if you are afraid of losing your job because that would make you look immature.’ Meanwhile rightsizing is coming. Bad management is rampant (and top heavy). There are managers that belittle, ignore, even yell at their staff. Others dump all the actual work on their staff with no guidance or support. Their names are known but if anyone asks that is not a trusted confidant you better not say anything for fear of retaliation. PSI has a non-retaliation policy that is a farse (see other glassdoor reviews of people who went to HR to with legitimate complaints of harassment only to be put on a performance improvement plan and let go). Given that HR is just as bad or worse at simultaneously doing nothing and being mean about it, it is not a surprise nothing is being done. Reminders of how lucky you are because ‘hundreds of people applied for your job and you were chosen’ with the unspoken and ‘hundreds more will apply when you are gone’ just to let you know that if you are upset about working conditions you can easily be replaced. Junior staff created a committee to bring complaints of harassment, bullying and low pay to leadership (notice they bypassed HR). The response was ‘PSI pays the market rate’ as if underpaying employees is acceptable because other organizations also do the same. The harassment was not addressed. The toxic work environment is so bad that people have exchanged stories about where the best place to cry is so often that it is common knowledge even if you do not need to. Turnover has been high which makes an organization already difficult to navigate even harder. There are no systems, no accountability, feeble attempts at keeping records and an attitude of ‘that’s not my job’ that permeates way too many interactions. There is a paralysis in decision making. It is literally no one’s job to make a decision. Because almost all work is done by lower level employees who do not have decision making authority, they find themselves running around like chickens with their heads cut off until even minor issues are escalated to the Vice President level (that isn’t too impressive, we have at least 10 of them now) where people who really shouldn’t be weighing in on the day-to-day have to get involved. People say ‘good luck’ when you tell them you are going to X person’s office because they have had to pull teeth to get X person to do their basic job functions. Racism from DC staff towards field staff is well known (see other glassdoor reviews). Expats (white, mostly Americans) who live in the countries we work yell at staff, make unfair demands to their time and say racist things. “These people cannot learn,” “these people are lazy,” “they will never understand,” “you have to hold their hands to get anything done.” Worth noting, many of these same people cannot be bothered to have a working knowledge of the 2nd (sometimes 3rd, 4th or 5th) language that local staff uses in the office. They cannot do basic daily tasks in the country they live in such as go to the market or catch a taxi on their own. If you are not sure why someone would move to a country where they do not like the people it's probably because they make 90k+ a year (with many making much more than 100k a year), plus 40% of their salary in cash benefits (that’s tax free), their kids tuition to exorbitantly expensive private schools are paid for, they get to go home 2 times a year on company/project funds, etc. In these countries drivers usually make around $500/month in salary and every expense report they submit is closely scrutinized because god forbid the guy making $6,000/year get an extra $20 in per diem (“those people are always out to take advantage of the system”). The positive reviews on glassdoor look like higher level staff (the one scolding people for leaving bad reviews was funny). They are generally happy because they make more money and are shielded from the worst of the office politics. Not surprisingly they often stay longer. Before you accept a position at PSI, read more of the reviews and really consider where you are in your career. I would not join PSI unless you are starting as a senior manager. It is not a place to grow your career.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 378 Reviews

Glassdoor has 523 Population Services International reviews submitted anonymously by Population Services International employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Population Services International is right for you.