I applied for the role through the company's website, which was listed as a contracting position under the NASA ROME contract. Shortly after, I received an email from the hiring manager inviting me for an onsite interview at NASA Goddard center. The interview was positive, with the hiring manager expressing satisfaction. I had the opportunity to tour the facility and meet more than 8 members of their group. The hiring manager told me that they will send me an offer within a couple of days; we also discussed the salary and everything was looking okay. However, despite assurances, I never received the expected offer. After a follow-up attempt with the original hiring manager went unanswered, I reached out to the HR team after two weeks. Surprisingly, I was informed that the initial hiring manager was no longer with the company, and someone else had taken over. The new hiring manager contacted me promptly, expressing interest in whether I was still interested in the role and scheduling another interview. Despite this, she failed to send the interview invitation as promised and has been unresponsive to my calls and emails. In my assessment, it appears that this company faces serious challenges in leadership and communication. Instances such as the lack of responses to emails and failure to communicate changes related to interview processes raise concerns. Even during my initial interview, I had to resort to calling the hiring manager directly to schedule an interview due to the lack of response to my emails. Establishing trust and making a positive first impression are crucial for any company, especially when dealing with federal agencies like NASA. The observed deficiencies in leadership and responsiveness, supported by employee reviews, cast doubt on the company's reliability. My advice, based on this experience, is to reconsider investing time and effort in pursuing opportunities with this company.