I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Clipboard
Interview
Was asked to answer 2 unbelievably open ended questions and was requested to be specific.
1. Pick a product or company (ideally a multi-sided marketplace, but only
if you have a good understanding of one, otherwise use any software product
or company). What is the actual product(s)? If you ran that product team
what would be your North Star metric, and the 2-5 key metrics that roll up
into the North Star? What would be the next three initiatives you would do
to move the needle the most?
2. Tell us a non-obvious customer insight that originated from a single (or
series) of customer conversations (i.e. not "I looked at our conversion
funnel data and saw X" but an actual customer conversation). What did you
do as a result of that insight (i.e. launch a feature / initiative /
process change etc). Did what you tried to do "stick" when you launched it
(i.e. did the feature work and have the impact on metrics as intended, did
the process change get adopted and followed)? If not, what did you do to
iterate (both the insight and/or the feature / initiative / process) as
needed?
I provided (what I felt to be) a comprehensive response and was asked to be more specific. When provided specifics, they thought I was not the candidate for them
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
1. Pick a product or company (ideally a multi-sided marketplace, but only
if you have a good understanding of one, otherwise use any software product
or company). What is the actual product(s)? If you ran that product team
what would be your North Star metric, and the 2-5 key metrics that roll up
into the North Star? What would be the next three initiatives you would do
to move the needle the most?
2. Tell us a non-obvious customer insight that originated from a single (or
series) of customer conversations (i.e. not "I looked at our conversion
funnel data and saw X" but an actual customer conversation). What did you
do as a result of that insight (i.e. launch a feature / initiative /
process change etc). Did what you tried to do "stick" when you launched it
(i.e. did the feature work and have the impact on metrics as intended, did
the process change get adopted and followed)? If not, what did you do to
iterate (both the insight and/or the feature / initiative / process) as
needed?
I applied online. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at Clipboard in Jun 2025
Interview
After seeing several pages of negative reviews about Clipboard Health, I decided to test things for myself. I submitted a completely fake resume—literally a PDF of cabling instructions. Despite that, I was invited to complete a case study.
The case study wasn’t simple busywork either. It involved analyzing a spreadsheet with over 2,600 rows and 12 columns of data—something that would easily take half a day or more to do right. Out of curiosity, I had AI generate a report and submitted it just to see if they actually reviewed the work.
Less than an hour later, I was rejected. There’s no way a real person read or meaningfully evaluated the submission. It just confirmed what I suspected: Clipboard Health appears to be collecting unpaid labor under the guise of a hiring process.
What’s worse, they don’t provide any feedback on what you supposedly did wrong. You give up several hours of your time for a task that benefits them, and they can't even offer a sentence of critique in return.
Combine that with how their own website tells you to ignore the negative Glassdoor reviews (a huge red flag), and it really starts to feel like a scammy operation. Even people who claimed to be hired by them describe poor communication, inconsistent expectations, and a lack of clarity.
Bottom line: steer clear. Clipboard Health seems more interested in getting free work than in hiring people fairly.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
They gave a 5 page word doc and over 2600 lines in excel to create a case study that was more than a days work.
I applied online. The process took 5 days. I interviewed at Clipboard (New York, NY) in Jun 2025
Interview
First, you fill out a basic form. Then, you’re asked to complete a detailed assessment involving a big dataset and case analysis. Unfortunately, they don’t appear to review submissions. I received an automated rejection email, and my analytics showed the assessment was never opened.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
They didn’t ask any direct questions; just assigned a detailed assessment involving a dataset and case analysis, along with a blog post about their internal practices.
The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Clipboard in Jun 2025
Interview
As all the other ratings mentioned, a case study came back as the next step. I don't mind this on principle as it is a skill-based assessment, though the way it is presented gives little direction on what they want, and there's no question or defined problem. They just throw 19 MB of data at you with some explanations on how the system works, and what columns are there. After spending a day and a half on figuring out what I could just to understand the scope of the data, I drilled down into what I felt was interesting since there is no guidance in the case. Five days later, I got the generic "thank you for completing the case study, but we will not be moving forward and we will not tell you why since we want to give more people the opportunity to do the same case."
They should have given more clear objectives to the case so I would not have invested so much time into it, or given me feedback so I could have at least learned something from the effort put into this job application.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Complete this "case study" which is just raw data and no objectives besides find something interesting.