I applied online. I interviewed at Clipboard in Sep 2024
Interview
Horrible. Did an automated “real world” work scenario via a company called Woven. They only give you 30 min to complete a PR because, according to the scenario, you want to leave on a Friday… then only 55 min to complete a coding assessment. One where there was enough of a scenario + documentation that I lost close to 10 min just to understand the problem. Didn’t get to finish, but after the fact I completed it and got it working on my own. I just needed another 20 min. If Woven and Clipboard Health thinks speed = good programmer, I’d avoid. Not only that, if you do make it to the next round, they want 2 additional coding exercises. Because one isn’t enough I guess… don’t waste your time.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Timed PR review and timed coding exercise to calculate monthly cost of something.
The interview process starts with a 90 minute take-home assignment followed by an initial interview. After that, candidates complete a 3 day Technical Design Document (TDD) assignment and review interview, then finish with a final hiring manager interview.
Both take-home assignments were genuinely fun and interesting problems to work through. After each one, you meet with an engineer to discuss your approach, the decisions you made, and alternative solutions, which made the process feel collaborative rather than adversarial. It was also a great opportunity to talk with people you could potentially be working with.
The final stage focused more on past experience and technical discussions around previous projects and problems I’ve worked on.
Overall, the interview process was well organized, moved fairly quickly, and the team was very supportive throughout.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Can you tell me about a project you worked on that you’re proud of?
I applied online. I interviewed at Clipboard in Apr 2026
Interview
Initial screening is all automated. They give you access to a small repo and a simple JavaScript endpoint to complete. Based on those results you proceed to next steps. I was rejected by initial screening, which was odd considering my output was the same they had in acceptance criteria. They also say the output didn’t pass their scripts, but they can’t provide feedback? Why not send the script result output? Either I missed something simple, or there were gaps in their instructions. Either way, would be easy to automate the feedback too if it’s just script output
Simple it starts with an assessment and then if you pass the assessment you get an interview based on assessment and then there is a documentation based assessment and the follow-up interview and then the final round interview
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Describe your thought process going through the project