The process involved a series of scenarios built around 1 repo and asking to update that repo and add specific features in the scenarios. What I really liked about it was I go to understand a great deal about the company, the work I would be doing, the stack I would be using, and I felt like they could really see my skills through it because it allowed me to show off what I could do.

Six-step process: 2 assessments, 2 follow-ups (one with the engineering manager), and a final round. Applied for the frontend global role, passed the first assessment and advanced to the first follow-up. Afterwards, I received a confusing rejection email: “...the specific role, in conjunction with the company stage, context, and existing supporting team may not be the best place to set you up to succeed.” This made little sense. I had only written a script at that stage, which they themselves invited me to interview for. The frontend interview also asked me to optimise backend code, which I completed successfully. So, what did this feedback really mean?