The interview process has been designed to reduce the amount of bias interviewers may bring to the table. There are typical conversations with the hiring manager and recruiter at the start, and then candidates move on to project/exercise-based interviews with members of the team. Interviewers usually evaluate the candidates based on the interviews and only get to review the candidate's resume at the end of the process.

Basically identical to the last reviewer. Interview with their HR/people person. She was super nice. I read a lot about how they are trying hard to remove bias from their interview/hiring process, which I totally commend them for. Was assigned an app redesign (1-2hrs of work).. which realistically, no one can only spend that much time. For that much work, you would only get my notes and thoughts... so of course you spend WAY more time on it. 30 min phone call to ask questions with a team member... was totally confusing... I was under the impression as I should treat them like a user, which is great I can ask very specific questions.. turns out it was not that at all. Found that out during the call, and they really didn't provide anything that wasn't in the original assignment, so I found that odd. Then I spent way too much time on the assignment, got a thank you but no thank you email to move forward. Which is the most bizarre part.. they didn't want you to even talk about your work or explain anything. It was a very confusing process. I appreciate that they are trying to do something different, but I think they should be open for feedback on the process, which they were not because I emailed them very nicely and offered to share feedback on my experience.