Associate Editor applicants have rated the interview process at Condé Nast with 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 29% positive. To compare, the company-average is 51.2% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Associate Editor roles take an average of 44 days to get hired, when considering 7 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Condé Nast overall takes an average of 22 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Condé Nast as a Associate Editor according to 7 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 36%
Skills test: 27%
Group panel interview: 18%
Phone interview: 9%
Other: 9%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 1+ week. I interviewed at Condé Nast (New York, NY) in Jan 2012
Interview
Before I met with the Director I as asked to put together a project biased on a few guidelines of the job.
I met with the Director outside of the company. I think was asked by HR to come in to meet with the rest of the team.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How do you see this magazine changing? In what director would you like to see it evolve?
-Submit an application and then afterwards (approximately three to four weeks) received an email confirming my preferences and then received a request for phone interview. Phone interview was twenty minutes long.
Screener call with HR contractor, followed (several weeks later) with an interview with hiring editor. Lots of lag time between application submission, first interview, then second. Interview times changed with little notice; process felt somewhat disorganized.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell me about your experience. What are your salary requirements. What attracted you to this job.
I applied online. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at Condé Nast in Jan 2022
Interview
Got a standard recruiter interview, followed by an interview with a direct team member who spent most of the time reading questions off a document and not very responsive to my answers. Then completed an editing test, didn't hear back for nearly a month, to be followed by a rejection.