The initial interview was a live coding test via computer. The second interview was an in-person coding day in which I was given a web application to complete. I thought of getting up and leaving during the day as the assigned project was impossible to complete in one day, but decided to stick it out and see the process thru. At the end of the day, I made a presentation to a group of about ten people detailing the project and my approach and code. The best way to describe the in-person code day would be like the fictional Kobayashi Maru test in Star Trek II. Basically, they give you a task which is nearly impossible to complete in the given time frame to see how far you get, how well you handle the stress, and how well you interact with them. It's an interesting approach with a few serious negatives. First, it takes your entire day without regard to your current employment, and second, they get to study how you perform but you get little time to understand their company, the job, and how they will be a benefit to your career. Although everyone was pleasant and helpful, the interview process told me a lot about their corporate culture. In a word, one-sided. They learn about you and you learn almost nothing about them. I felt a little bit like a lab mouse (a cute furry one). By the end of the process, I can honestly say that I know as much about their company as I did before I applied for the job, and it would have been a better use of my time looking elsewhere from the start.