Senior Software Engineer applicants have rated the interview process at Cruise with 3.1 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 45% positive. To compare, the company-average is 40.1% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Senior Software Engineer roles take an average of 27 days to get hired, when considering 53 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Cruise overall takes an average of 26 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Cruise as a Senior Software Engineer according to 53 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 35%
Presentation: 20%
One on one interview: 19%
Group panel interview: 7%
Skills test: 7%
IQ intelligence test: 5%
Drug test: 4%
Personality test: 2%
Background check: 1%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Cruise (San Francisco, CA) in Mar 2018
Interview
I was reached out by an external recruiter to apply to cruise. Afterwards, I was referred to an internal recruiter to schedule my phone interview. Standard process, algorithmic question over an online interpreter. After passing this, we scheduled an onsite for about a month later, since I had complications with my schedule.
Onsite was in Cruise offices on San Francisco. I was asked to bring my own laptop to work on the coding exercises. The schedule was
- 2 coding exercises with my laptop. The interviewer stated the problem, we discussed the solution together and then I implemented it on the computer, running it against an example. The questions were planted on the spot, they weren't from a standard bank of questions
- 1 architecture design interview. Explain architecture of a service on a whiteboard.
- 1 interview with the manager about the team and the position I was applying to
- 1 interview with the recruiter about standard HR stuff.
I found the people that were working on the projects really passionate about the work that they do and had a very insightful architecture discussion with the team. The coding and design interviews also felt more collaborative than in other places: if I happened to be stuck with something unrelated to the problem statement they would not hesitate to lend a hand. Although I didn't got an offer I was offered a call with the recruiter with feedback about my interview, which very few companies do. Overall I found it a pleasant experience.
I applied through an employee referral. I interviewed at Cruise (San Francisco, CA)
Interview
The interview process consisted of an initial recruiter screen followed by a technical phone interview focused on data structures and problem-solving in Python. The onsite loop included 4 rounds: one coding round (medium LeetCode-style problem), one system design round focused on building a scalable ML data processing pipeline, one backend/API design round, and one behavioral round. Interviewers emphasized real-world problem solving, tradeoffs, and communication. Overall, the process was structured and aligned with large-scale distributed systems and ML infrastructure.
Online submission. Then contacted by recruiter. The phone screening, and then onsite, which lasted an entire day in San Francisco office. Sat in a room while interviewers came and left.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
generic questions, nothing to really test what I knew. The interviewers seemed to not know how to interview a candidate and what to look for. I didn't want to work there after what i saw.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Cruise in Nov 2024
Interview
The interview process consisted of a one-hour coding challenge followed by a one-hour deep dive with the hiring manager.
The coding challenge involved solving a LeetCode hard-level problem,
The discussion with the hiring manager focused on previous experience. Mismatch in chemistry. Rejected.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
coding round: lc high frequency hard
HM round: project deep dive