I recently interviewed for a role at Deloitte and, honestly, the experience was not up to the standard I was expecting from such a reputed firm. The communication between the HR team and candidates felt inconsistent — I had to follow up multiple times just to confirm my interview schedule. During the interview itself, the panel seemed distracted, and a few of the questions felt irrelevant to the role I applied for. The process lacked structure; there were no clear introductions, and the feedback provided afterward was vague and unhelpful. For a company known for its professionalism, I expected a smoother and more candidate-friendly experience. I would encourage Deloitte to invest more in interviewer training and create a more transparent, respectful process for candidates. Pros: Quick scheduling once confirmed Brand name on resume if you get through Cons: Poor communication Unstructured interviews Lack of clear feedback Would you like me to make it harsher and more critical (to strongly warn other candidates), or keep it constructive but professional (to encourage Deloitte to improve without sounding too negative)?

Technical Rounds (2): Two in-depth technical interview rounds focused on evaluating core computer science fundamentals, problem-solving skills, and practical development experience. The discussion began with detailed questions based on my resume, including projects, internships, and technical contributions. Interviewers asked language-specific questions covering the programming languages and frameworks mentioned on my resume, assessing concepts such as object-oriented programming, data structures, algorithms, and language-specific features. Backend topics included APIs, databases, server-side architecture, authentication, and system design fundamentals, while frontend questions focused on HTML, CSS, JavaScript, framework concepts, state management, and responsive UI development. Additionally, general Computer Science topics such as operating systems, DBMS, computer networks, SQL, and software engineering principles were discussed to evaluate overall technical proficiency and problem-solving approach.