Risk Advisory Analyst applicants have rated the interview process at EY with 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 67% positive. To compare, the company-average is 74.2% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Risk Advisory Analyst roles take an average of 14 days to get hired, when considering 3 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at EY overall takes an average of 30 days.
Common stages of the interview process at EY as a Risk Advisory Analyst according to 3 Glassdoor interviews include:
Personality test: 50%
One on one interview: 50%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 5 days. I interviewed at EY
Interview
First round was a pre-recorded video interview, the process was rather annoying. Felt kind of unwelcome despite the pre-recorded friendly faces. The questions were all your typical behavioral related ones. Nothing so special and wasn't very difficult. But the overall experience was very poor, ended up turning down round two.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at EY (Melbourne) in Jun 2025
Interview
Applied via company careers portal; the recruiters responded within a week and scheduled a 30-minute phone screen. HR recruiter asked about background, motivation for EY, availability and salary expectations. Behavioral questions focused on teamwork and deadlines
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell me about a time you had to meet a tight deadline
I applied through campus recruiting. First did a kira video interview, followed by a super-day in person (Back-to-back interview), which includes one case interview with senior manager and one behavioral interview with partner.
I applied through college or university. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at EY (Mumbai) in Oct 2019
Interview
Very relevant questions and a clear line of questioning. Interviewers made me feel very comfortable. 2 interviewers were present. One HR personnel and one other senior
employee was present and they asked questions alternatively.