The interview process took 84 days. Almost three months of waiting and scheduling. They had me go through three virtual interviews, all of which were with individuals outside of Environment America. I was never given an actual, clear idea what this role would look like on a day-to-day basis. I had asked multiple times but was just told it would "depend." The first interview was your average HR-style preliminary interview asking questions about why you applied, your experience, etc. The second one was similar, with additional situational questions about how you would approach environmental campaign issues. The third interview was solely for the purpose of assessing how well you fit in with the company's morals. I take issue with the third interview. The messaging of this organization is that they are non-partisan and they work with everyone, yet the third interview is literally just a quiz to see if you align with them. If you do not align with them on every issue, ESPECIALLY environmental justice, you will not receive an offer. The third interview was around 27 questions where you would get two answer choices to select from. "Is the Democratic Party too progressive or not progressive enough?" "Should we try to pack the courts with liberal judges or allow the system to correct itself when it comes to fairness in decision making?" "Would you pass a cigarette tax that negatively impacted lower income communities?" "Would you rather protect wildlife or people?" "Should we focus on abolishing the electoral college?" What does any of that have to do with my ability to successfully run an environmental campaign? After the third interview, they told me I would have to wait two weeks to get an answer. I was rejected. If your organization is focused on diversity and a wealth of opinions (as advertised on the website), why is one entire round of the interview process meant to weed out anyone who might slightly disagree with very personal political opinions? Like I said before, this was an 84 day process. Waste of time.