AI Data Trainer applicants have rated the interview process at Invisible Technologies with 2.8 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 33% positive. To compare, the company-average is 30% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for AI Data Trainer roles take an average of 11 days to get hired, when considering 6 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Invisible Technologies overall takes an average of 32 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Invisible Technologies as a AI Data Trainer according to 6 Glassdoor interviews include:
Skills test: 33%
Group panel interview: 17%
Presentation: 17%
Phone interview: 8%
One on one interview: 8%
Background check: 8%
Personality test: 8%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. I interviewed at Invisible Technologies (San Francisco, CA) in Dec 2022
Interview
1- You apply with your curriculum. 2- They sent you an assessment and then you have to upload some videos talking about it. 3- If they liked you, they will coordinate with you to have an interview. 4- You get the job or not.
I applied online. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at Invisible Technologies in Aug 2024
Interview
Did not hesitate to reject my letter application without even giving me a reason why.
I did not bother re applying. I might consider it in the future though or not.
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Invisible Technologies (Accra) in Apr 2024
Interview
- Long, tedious. High-volume applications, selective people they process even if your qualifications match.
- Interviewing in batches
- They may never reach your turn, but they would keep in touch: letting you know the situation at hand.
I applied online. I interviewed at Invisible Technologies
Interview
The interview process was interesting.
I am still waiting for a response but to give a little bit of insight: I had a test about my level of English and the other two were about logic and reasoning.