Production Supervisor applicants have rated the interview process at Keurig Dr Pepper with 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 100% positive. To compare, the company-average is 57% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Production Supervisor roles take an average of 14 days to get hired, when considering 2 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Keurig Dr Pepper overall takes an average of 24 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Keurig Dr Pepper as a Production Supervisor according to 2 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 50%
Group panel interview: 25%
One on one interview: 25%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. I interviewed at Keurig Dr Pepper (Columbus, OH) in Aug 2019
Interview
Phone interview with supply chain recruiter at corporate office. The recruiter gave a review of the company including the current growth of products offered. Then there were many questions concerning my background and experience. The interview took about thirty minutes.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The question was about knowledge of Lean Manufacturing and examples of applications.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Keurig Dr Pepper (Vernon, CA) in Jul 2019
Interview
Overall it was a positive interview process. I thought I did well and showed my abilities. However, towards the end, there were some negative signs such as them forgetting to do a facility tour, which I had to ask for and was a bad sign. The recruiter somehow mixed up my name for somebody else and was confused about which interview stage I was at. This was a stark contrast to how positive and attentive they were at the beginning.
Ultimately, I was rejected on the basis that they didn't believe I can adapt to their culture and that my company culture did not provide me the style of leadership they were looking for. This was despite my attempts to convey the idea that I was even going against certain aspects of my company culture to hold some accountability. Funnily enough, they thought I am not going to be able to hold workers accountable through adaptation.
I do not like this reason for rejection and I suspect it was only an excuse to hire someone with more exact experience. This means they assume I cannot adapt or gather courage to take action in the face of resistance. Other than that, the process was respectful and positive until the very end.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How did you lead change of culture at a previous employer?