practical and hand on. 3 tech rounds. live coding involved but not heavily focused. experience demonstration is more important. interviewers are friendly and helpful. however the whole process can be very lengthy

The interview process was good, Li spoke well and was friendly. Tested knowledge on Rust by asking questions about concepts and features generics, enums, clone/copy etc Asked about work experience and specifically how I approached certain problems and how they were fixed. The coding part was looking at some code and answering questions. Then onto a codepad website to solve a sliding window solution. Overall; good interview, relaxed and friendly.

I had a disappointing interview experience. The interviewer appeared to have limited proficiency in English, despite the fact that English is one of the major languages spoken in the city where the interview took place. This created significant communication barriers. Whenever I used technical terms (for example, API), I first had to check if the interviewer was familiar with them. Most of the time, the answer was no, which forced me to spend several minutes explaining basic concepts in another language. As a result, what should have been a one-hour technical interview turned into repeated explanations of fundamental programming concepts, leaving little time for meaningful discussion of my skills or experience. The interview difficulty mainly come from the language barrier