The Subsidiary Security Manager role at SITA appears attractive on paper, particularly given its international scope and exposure to critical operations. However, the recruitment experience falls significantly short of expectations for a company of this scale and reputation. After progressing through interviews, communication abruptly stopped with no feedback or status update. This lack of closure reflects poorly on the organization’s hiring maturity and raises concerns about internal coordination and candidate respect. Ghosting candidates—especially at senior levels—is not only unprofessional but also damaging to employer branding. For a company operating in security-critical environments, one would expect a higher standard of process discipline and accountability. At minimum, candidates should receive timely updates and proper closure, even in rejection scenarios. Overall, a disappointing experience that does not align with the level of professionalism implied by the role itself.