New Grad RN applicants have rated the interview process at Sharp HealthCare with 3.1 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 75% positive. To compare, the company-average is 73.3% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for New Grad RN roles take an average of 36 days to get hired, when considering 16 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Sharp HealthCare overall takes an average of 30 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Sharp HealthCare as a New Grad RN according to 16 Glassdoor interviews include:
Group panel interview: 56%
Phone interview: 13%
Other: 6%
Skills test: 6%
Drug test: 6%
One on one interview: 6%
Background check: 6%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 2 months. I interviewed at Sharp HealthCare (La Mesa, CA) in Dec 2015
Interview
Applied at the end of October 2015 and a month later received an e-mail saying that they were interested in interviewing me. I replied to the e-mail right away and got an interview at the beginning of December. Interviewed with the unit manager and supervisor. The interview lasted for 30 minutes. They alternated questions.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Why would you like to work at Sharp? Give us an example where you stood up for your patient, etc.
If selected, you will be emailed to select an available interview date. Once there, there will be a panel of interviewers who made me feel comfortable, and asked the general questions like tell me about yourself, why should we hire you, etc
Was interviewed by 2 people, very casual and not much conversation. They seem to be scoring your answers while looking at your portfolio. Total was about 15 minutes, went by super fast.
I applied online. I interviewed at Sharp HealthCare
Interview
It was a panel with unit managers, very welcoming. They asked questions back and forth from a pre-made list. Varying on topics relating working with others, prioritization, experiences, ethical dilemma.