Unconventional Software Engineer Interview Process. As an experienced industry professional, I'm familiar with typical Silicon Valley interview practices. However, Sonatus's approach stood out as particularly intense and unconventional. The virtual onsite interview consisted of 4 rounds of coding challenges, which seemed excessive. While brief discussions about background and project experience occurred, the focus was predominantly on coding exercises. All questions appeared to be sourced from LeetCode, making the process feel more like a coding competition than a comprehensive assessment of engineering skills. Interview Structure: 4 rounds of coding challenges Minimal time spent on background/experience discussion LeetCode-style questions throughout While two interviewers conducted themselves professionally, I had concerns with the approach of the other three: Two interviewers turned off their cameras after presenting the coding challenge, appearing disengaged for the remainder of the session. One interviewer's demeanor was confrontational, asking impractical questions and expressing visible frustration when responses didn't align with expectations. Overall, the interview process felt overly focused on algorithmic problem-solving at the expense of assessing other crucial software engineering skills. A more balanced approach would likely yield better insights into a candidate's overall fit and capabilities.

3 rounds of interviews. 1 with HR and 2 others technical. The first one 30 minutes the other ones took an hour. After passing the interviews fine after the last round haven't heard back from the company. Requested a response but didn't get any. No idea why it is so hard to respond and reject like a normal human being.

People seemed nice, but the interview process was really long, dragging out over 4 weeks. The product looks clunky and complicated to use. The CTO contradicted several things the hiring manager previously said, which was a big red flag.