Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.
Bowls
Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.
Followed companies
Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.
Job searches
Get personalized job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.
Sutter Gould Medical Foundation interviews FAQs
Call Center Receptionist applicants have rated the interview process at Sutter Gould Medical Foundation with 3.5 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 50% positive. To compare, the company-average is 80% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Call Center Receptionist roles take an average of 29 days to get hired, when considering 2 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Sutter Gould Medical Foundation overall takes an average of 28 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Sutter Gould Medical Foundation as a Call Center Receptionist according to 2 Glassdoor interviews include:
Group panel interview: 25%
Phone interview: 25%
Drug test: 25%
Presentation: 13%
Skills test: 13%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (Modesto, CA) in Nov 2018
Interview
Previously interviewed but did not have typing certificate with me.
Applied Online
Continuously applied for months
Had a phone screening
Attended Panel Interview
Turned in typing certificate
Received Offer
Passed Background
Currently waiting for physical appointment
Have a scheduled start date for mid December
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (Modesto, CA)
Interview
Application, panel interview, background check and drug screen. You walk in a room and there are 4 people on a panel. Each take turns asking you a series of questions and write down your responses.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
What was one good quality about a previous supervisor and one bad quality.