Research Associate applicants have rated the interview process at Unilever with 3.5 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 50% positive. To compare, the company-average is 66.8% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Research Associate roles take an average of 13 days to get hired, when considering 4 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Unilever overall takes an average of 31 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Unilever as a Research Associate according to 4 Glassdoor interviews include:
Group panel interview: 38%
Presentation: 25%
Skills test: 13%
Phone interview: 13%
One on one interview: 13%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
Good very supportive, 5 people panel, very structured and honest approach. They genuinely want to hire good candidates and wiling to go the extra mile for that. Very good experience. They are not there to show that they are better than you but interested in you and what you know.
Other Research Associate Interview Reviews for Unilever
I applied online. The process took 4 months. I interviewed at Unilever (London, England) in Jun 2018
Interview
Two telephone interviews, with a final face to face interview. This was a seamless process, however the only down side was the length of time it took overall. However the wait was worthwhile.
I applied through college or university. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Unilever
Interview
Hindustan Unilever came to our university to hire Interns. For Chemical Engineering (3 rd Year)
They had a CV shortlisting which was then followed by a Group Discussion (Case Study), and then they had two rounds of interview.
The Interviewers were Technical Heads as I had applied for the R&D Position.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Various technical Questions were asked, which were very trivial and only aim was to test the way the person thinks, that is to judge the thought process of the person.
Other than that the questions were pretty normal HR type.