Anaplan Associate Software Engineer reviews

4.4

46% would recommend to a friend

(6 total reviews)
avatar

Charlie Gottdiener

85% approve of CEO

6% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

6 reviews
2.0
Feb 25, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For the whole year I was at the company, there were practically no deadlines for anything. Coasting and taking your time is encouraged. Remote working. Most people are friendly and helpful, pleasant to work with. Smaller teams helps build rapport. Good work-life balance. Hackathons. Nice office. Great onboarding material for the product itself. Collaborative environment. Good people. Company cares about well-being.

Cons

A slow-moving "big corporate" where there's no passion or drive. Lots of red tape. I did barely any programming during my time at the company, despite emphasizing this as my main desire (it's not just me either, others feel the same way). Deep management hierarchies and top-down leadership who bring in sudden policy changes without consultation means your manager is basically powerless. Engineers are treated as bodies to throw at any problems the company has with zero regard for what their interests and expertise/skillsets. Priorities change all the time. You're basically treated as "just another cog in the machine", but given no actual onboarding or training required to do your job. They expect you to wear many different hats and do "DevOps" type work. Jira tickets will appear on your team's Kanban with zero explanation and sometimes no detail at all on them, that have no development involved whatsoever. If you are lucky enough to ever touch your IDE, it will be trivial bug fixes or config changes. Feature development is tedious due to the company's horrendously complicated build & release pipelines and properties, despite multiple teams working on this full-time to improve it. Despite having QAs, SREs, Level 3 support, network engineers, platform engineers and dedicated teams for infrastructure, regular devs are expected to be involved in day-to-day operations and infrastructure problems that is beyond the scope of what a software developer ought to be doing: this is rationalised as "we're engineers, not developers". The whole notion of "reactive" and on-call policy is not at all well-thought out; by the company's own admission, nobody is expected to have the answers, but are nonetheless required to participate and effectively act as a "call centre" for production incidents. There is zero attempt at onboarding people onto the tooling (e.g. Splunk) and the company's legacy codebase. Lots of time is wasted in refinement sessions and other meetings. Corporate all-hands meetings are a hilarious joke that people laugh about on private channels because they're very American and basically showbiz rather than anything substantial. Too many Slack channels.

avatar
Anaplan Response
4y
Thank you for your review. It’s great to hear you recognize the effort and intention we put into our employees’ well-being, including a good work life balance. We trust our employees to work independently and encourage them to explore new ideas and ways to creatively solve problems, which means things tend to move quickly around here. We also recognize how important it is for both management and leadership to prioritize your individual career path and enable you to grow to your fullest potential and are actively evaluating where we can improve when it comes to employee development. We’re proud of the strong workplace culture and values we have today but recognize this may not be the right fit for everyone.
Viewing 4 - 6 of 6 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,171 Anaplan reviews submitted anonymously by Anaplan employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Anaplan is right for you.