BAE Systems reviews

3.9

75% would recommend to a friend

(4,232 total reviews)
avatar

Charles Woodburn

82% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

BAE Systems has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 4,232 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The BAE Systems employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
1.0
Nov 6, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company branding Some employment stability

Cons

- High bench time - People being squeezed into roles that aren't related to their development path or expertise - Little path for promotion from grade GG10 onwards - Many projects follow poor standards - Not organisationally aligned. There are many departments working in silos. - just finished a large wave of redundancies. More are expected

1.0
Nov 5, 2024

Very Toxic Company and Managment

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Just a regular pay check

Cons

Racism, Racism, Racism. Don't even consider Nashua location or firmwide if you're not WHITE!

2.0
Nov 5, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work-wise, the level of effort required is about 30% of what would be expected by a small electronics company, so you really do get a fantastic level of renumeration in relation to the amount of exertion necessary to meet the job requirements. You can further increase this by taking a shift at less conventional hours, such as 14:00 to 00:00 and get a 25% increase + work one less day per week. You will never be punished for being useless, for not understanding the fundamentals of the product, or simply using the slightest technicality in the bloated, over-proceduralised working practices to do virtually nothing. As the management have zero knowledge of the time requirements of the work, and UNITE is extremely effective in preventing any repudiation of poor performance even when detected, it was easy to prepare work in such a way as to appear highly efficient and even be rewarded as an example, while doing next to nothing for half of the time. If you want money for old boots, this is the job for you, but don't expect to be doing much other than wishing your life away while you're at work. This is reliable income, and as long as you appear pathetic, incompetent and therefore don't threaten the management you will have a long and profitable career ahead of you. Put your earbuds in and listen to podcasts and autopilot the nominal work.

Cons

Forget about being able to fix any problem that presents itself. These are solved by highly suboptimal and provisional means which are then extended indefinitely. Even the simplest common-sense ideas for solving the daily problems on the floor are rejected by the management, as these are not visible in their spreadsheets and therefore everything is 'working' as intended. Expect to see broken/worn out tools, test fixtures improvised out of plastic crates, foam pads and bungee cords and a general air of defeatism and resignment to these by those on the floor. Knackered test equipment falling to pieces, constantly being wheeled/clattered through corridors, empty kanban boards; cleared out to rush production to meet pointless targets that only make life harder for everyone on the floor and ultimately result in lower productivity the next month. The administration has an obsession with outsourcing what it can do in-house, rather than improve efficiency and staff competency, resulting in almost unbelievable quality defects considering the application that are seldom detected until the final stages of production, at which point chaos reigns supreme! The entire production and engineering process is governed by an ever-growing bureaucracy of Team Leaders, Production Leads, Quality Coordinators, Compliance Officers, Project Owners, Quality Production and Manufacturing Engineers, Liaison Officers, and Botanic Infusion Specialists (OK - I made the last one up!), who do nothing but send each other e-mails, are never on the floor and only hamper work with pointless procedures that do nothing but waste time and exasperate the few people who actually want to see something done by the end of their work-day. All of these individuals, not hired for their competence, form cliques/WhatsApp groups that allow them to manipulate Human Resources to do their bidding to anyone who threatens their sinecures and leverage their personal characteristics highly effectively against anyone they deem not to share their objectives - those objectives being to maintain the status-quo of constantly running on broken legs! The products themselves appear more to be prototypes that meet a specification, but still have issues. Many sub-graduate level mistakes and suboptimal defects in the designs themselves that needlessly increase component count and create problems further down the line to be fixed through additional short-term procedures rather than tackling the root cause in the design itself. Provisional measures become permanent, ensuring an endless supply of Sisyphean tasks. Woe betide he who objects to such an ignominious state of affairs and tries to fix these problems! Such a sorry misguided individual will quickly be sent on a wild goose chase to different desks before being told that it's not a problem as the spreadsheet says everything's OK, or that it would be unapproved and therefore impossible.

Viewing 781 - 783 of 4,232 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,733 BAE Systems reviews submitted anonymously by BAE Systems employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if BAE Systems is right for you.