Bloomberg reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(8,237 total reviews)
avatar

Michael R. Bloomberg and Vlad Kliatchko

85% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Bloomberg has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 8,237 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Bloomberg employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

8K reviews
1.0
Jun 13, 2017

Software Engineer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I know well with the engineering department; not too familiar with other departments. - One of the most prestigious names in the financial industry. - A rich number of opportunities to get experience in multiple areas in finance. - As in New York, Bloomberg pays well for entry/mid-level employees. - One of the best benefit plans in New York. - Offices are really nice (fish tanks, free food). - Great work/life balance in some teams.

Cons

Again, I can only judge it in an engineer's points of views: - Just so-so tech infrastructure among financial companies (not even counting some HFT firms). They use extremely out-of-date infrastructure that many had abandoned in early 2000. The key thing is: software engineering is NOT the money-maker; technical improvement is always secondary to "keep things working as they are because clients need foobar before next week". In fact, even among financial companies, Bloomberg's tech infrastructure is no more than the average. You would be crying once you get into this company and learn what they're still trying to get on-board is something that mainstream has been using since 10 years ago. Seriously, take a look at what’s popular 10 years ago and you’ll know how slow and frightening that Bloomberg moves ahead. - However, compared to regular tech companies (not even to mention the big names), Bloomberg's tech stack is something that engineers may feel shame to talk about at their class re-unions. In fact, this is the most critical thing for young engineers who'd like to keep sharp in tech. To put it in the simplest way: Bloomberg (at its best eng teams) offers great opportunities to make single-cylinder combustion engines. Other tech companies provide engineers with some engines (proprietary and/or open-source) and they end up making rockets and space shuttles. At its regular teams in financial divisions, the tech stack is just... It’s all about the business logic. NO TECH! - No respect to former employees. Bloomberg never hires back former employees as loyalty is a key. So if you left, HR is not likely to take you serious anymore because they know you’re not coming back. This happened to many of my colleagues who left the company. They got poor or even no support from the company for tax, health, immigration and legal needs. Some of them got into troubles because of that. Just sad. - Blame-based performance evaluation system (they'll tell you it's merit-based but nope). Not too many chances/incentives to outperform. - Work/life balance at some teams can be disastrous. - Any fault is recorded. Low tolerance to faults, especially in divisions that make money. - Pays much less than the top tech companies.

1.0
May 27, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hours are a lot less compared to if you were doing this elsewhere. Good benefits such as health etc..

Cons

Let me start by saying that if you think that this is a research department you will be horribly mistaken. This department reports into news and is nothing more than a glorified department of news. You will be lucky to find any form of analysis that you could use to form an investment decision and if you did use it as investment advice for your clients I would be very worried. This isn’t necessarily because of the analysts it’s more to do with the direction and strategy from management. There are some very bright, intelligent and talented analysts and associates here and there also some very overpayed, lazy and unqualified senior analysts that have more or less won the lotto by getting paid the sums they do for putting out what they call research. These senior analysts and management are one of the reasons for poor morale in the department and why most people are looking to get out. In the majority of cases this is where washed out and incompetent senior analysts come to retire and die. The only worrying thing is why does management continue to spend the sums they do to hire such incompetent analysts that they believe are well known in the market place and will bring a reputable franchise with them when it always continues to prove otherwise. The downside to this for the rest of the employees is that when it comes to the end of the year, associates and company analysts end up with a 0-3% pay increase because management has wasted so much money elsewhere or only look after the select clique. The management structure also means that the people rating you and the people that you report to at the end of the year don’t actually work with you and have no way of properly understanding the work you have done or carried out during the year. This usually results in a farce of an end of year review, as its based purely on hearsay. In fact one of the senior analysts (one of the better senior analysts) recently left because he had no control over some of the other analysts who were below him in the same industry and left due to the poor quality of research. There are three way you will join this department: Senior Analyst: This is where you are expected to have 15+ years of experience covering your specific industry and are expected to be a well know figure in that space. In reality these are people with a very unknown or poor track record and in some cases haven’t even covered that industry before. On the plus side if you can secure a senior analyst role it’s like winning the lottery in terms of the amount of compensation that management will throw your way. Company Analyst: This is where you will have had a couple of years on the street covering your industry and you come in as an experienced hire. In most cases this is where the smart employees are, but unfortunately are constantly shot down by the senior analysts and management. Associate: This is where you will come in as a junior. DO NOT DO THIS!!! It will be damaging to your career. You will know nothing about financial modeling, you will probably work for a senior who has no idea what they are doing and you will never get a job on Wall Street with the Bloomberg Intelligence name on your CV. This will pigeon hole you for life. This could be a great department but given the Senior Analyst clique and managements strategy it just isn’t. It is a giant blackhole on Bloomberg’s finances with no ROI. If management scrutinized what was going on a bit more, there is a good chance the department would be shut down. Senior people in Bloomberg Intelligence are regularly lying and misleading the senior management in the company.

1.0
Apr 26, 2016

Global Data Analyst

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The office is sleek and modern. Fish tanks line the walls and the glass door conference rooms create an open atmosphere. The kitchen has a lot of healthy snacks and 3 free meals a day is a luxury most other offices don't have. The people for the most part are all really nice and there is a good feeling of camaraderie amongst a lot of the younger analysts. The salary and the benefits are second to none and the global company events like the New York summer picnic as well as philanthropy are amazing.

Cons

Ok, here it goes. This office is a sinking ship. The entire department is an outdated mix of 20+ year analysts who are so complacent in their current roles that the first whisper of automation makes them cringe with the thought of losing their jobs. The attrition rate among younger employees is astronomical as they realize within 6 months of being there that this is the biggest waste of time and effort since their freshmen year art elective. If you enjoy working with data, and by that I mean entering digit after digit without giving any thought whatsoever to what it means, and who uses it, then send in your resume their looking for people like you. There is no room for growth, although they will tell you differently through all the different seminars and information sessions. You start in data, you will end in data, unless you actively look for something better outside the company. And the reason for that brings me to my final point... The upper management of Global Data in Princeton, NJ is the most inept, unintelligent, smug, condescending, bureaucratic, and just downright incompetent bunch of individuals to run a department. Most of them have been there since the building was opened, which somehow legitimizes there sense of entitlement. They preach transparency and collaboration yet they offer no insight and no growth opportunities, unless that means making their jobs easier so they have more time to talk about little league in the kitchen. They pick favorites with a nice smile and they let the rest fend for themselves. If you have any sense of self-worth, keep searching Glassdoor for jobs.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 8,237 Reviews

Glassdoor has 10,082 Bloomberg reviews submitted anonymously by Bloomberg employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Bloomberg is right for you.