Booz Allen Hamilton reviews

3.9

74% would recommend to a friend

(10,438 total reviews)
avatar

Horacio D. Rozanski

79% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Booz Allen Hamilton has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 10,438 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Booz Allen Hamilton employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

10K reviews
1.0
Mar 21, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work/Family Life balance is respected here at Booz Allen.

Cons

Booz Allen boosts themselves to be above the rest and to be part of an elite group of consultants, but the real fact is far from that. Management is distant from employees, company values change too often, company looks only at the bottom line and forgets about the people that bring in that revenue, poor advancement opportunities, salary competitiveness is below average due to the high costs of overhead and expected company profit, and the list can go on and on. Leadership, at least at the Quantico area location, is immature and lacks a lot of the basic leadership skills needed to be an effective and powerful leader. Management changes in this area quite often giving the impression that no one wants to be on this team long. If you are planning on joining the Booz Allen team, be aware that you must negotiate your best possible deal up front as when you get in you are pretty much locked in to a bleak future. Another interesting fact, the turn over rate here at the Quantico team is very high. Not only myself, but I know of 6 to 7 other people within the same year leave the firm and never look back. This alone gives solid testament to the fact that something is not right. Just be warned is all I have to say!

1.0
Sep 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People, always great people from various backgrounds who work hard serving clients on a daily basis.

Cons

Promotions: Non-existent for most employees as there is no written formal path to promotion. It is entirely upon your leadership to submit a request and verify that your market can absorb the increase of your new salary (2-5%), If this is not possible you will sit at the same level for several years. Salary: Barter high when you come on board because salary increases are extremely sparse at the lower employee level, most receive between 0-2% a year. Discussions to increase salary according to increased client work, obtaining an advanced degree or certification will not result in any increase, sadly. Bonuses: These only occur at the Senior Associate level and higher, so if you spend nights and weekends working on proposals and doing business development, you only helped pad their compensation packet for the year. You will receive nothing for your time other than a thank you E-mail. Survey: Results are dismal in several areas primarily with salary, compensation, bonuses, and the like. Senior leadership has touted transparency and fixes, but to date hasn't even briefed the results other than a snippet of the results that were massaged in order to shape the message. Career assessment: Career assessment has no linkage to yearly salary adjustment, it is merely a paper drill to make someone feel like they are helping. Most career managers within the company are the same level as the people they are managing, which makes it a little difficult to recommend ho to succeed from the same hole. Most career managers are just time card monitors who check to see if you have done your time daily. Sad excuse for career progression, definitely not a Google or Amazon type of work environment. Transparency: Near zero, once in awhile the CEO sends out an E-mail to state where he has been and what he has been up to, very little material on who he saw and what they were doing. Very little leadership engagement with employees, most have never seen there leadership at all. Like an episode of Undercover Boss in reverse, most couldn't tell you who their leadership were at the 3rd level above them, since they have never received an E-mail from them nor seen them. Surveys come out once a year, but they are pre-populated with weighted answers that phrase questions such as, do you like X or love X, do you think you leadership has done a fantastic job or great job. Very poor survey approach with no ability to capture what is wrong with the company. No ability to either capture the issues nor to effect change on them if captured. Left hand of the firm has no clue what the right hand is doing. Nor regard for anyone at the associate and below level, if the CEO wanted to know what was going on within the firm he would grab individuals from remote sites, client sites and little no name sites with 10 people and ask them how he could help, but nope, its picture time, let me go to the big locations and get some golfing in. No anonymity to report issues as evidenced by the numerous posts on this site.

4.0
Jun 23, 2015

Great Place to Start

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent training opportunities and ability to learn a lot about the classic GMC capabilities (e.g., strategic planning, organizational design, change management). Great collegial culture, and awesome people for the most part. Great 401k matching program. Flexibility in terms of work location.

Cons

Hard to move between horizontally, which can lead to a stale work life (i.e., solving the same problems for the same type of clients). Pay is below average when compared to competitors (e.g., Deloitte, PWC). Health benefits.

Viewing 181 - 183 of 10,438 Reviews

Glassdoor has 11,070 Booz Allen Hamilton reviews submitted anonymously by Booz Allen Hamilton employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Booz Allen Hamilton is right for you.