Coleman Consulting Group reviews

Unable to figure out their target audience, CEO uncomfortable with changing outdated methods.

Poor Communication Issue: Initial communication was inconsistent and unclear, particularly around deployment dates and logistics. Last-minute changes were conveyed too late, impacting personal arrangements. Impact: Created confusion, led to unnecessary personal expenses, and hindered trust and confidence in the contract terms. Lack of Responsiveness and Support Issue: Repeated requests for clarification on travel and vehicle policies went ignored or received dismissive responses. Impact: This left critical concerns unaddressed, particularly regarding reimbursement and contract terms, resulting in financial and logistical challenges. Unprofessional and Dismissive Leadership Issue: Direct interactions with leadership were dismissive and lacked empathy, showing a lack of regard for contractor concerns. Impact: Undermined morale and highlighted a lack of professional courtesy and respect. Inconsistent Contract Management Issue: CCG did not follow through on promised deployment support, including clarifications on financial obligations and reimbursement terms. Impact: Caused unexpected costs for the contractor and added stress due to unclear expectations. Abrupt Contract Termination Issue: After expressing valid concerns, CCG responded by terminating the contract, citing a poor "fit" rather than addressing the real issues. Impact: This response felt retaliatory rather than solution-oriented, preventing resolution and future cooperation.