Criteo reviews

3.9

73% would recommend to a friend

(1,434 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Komasinski

39% approve of CEO

46% positive business outlook

Criteo has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,434 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Criteo employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
4.0
Feb 16, 2022

A big company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- all advantages of a big company (healthcare, stability, interesting projects) - industry leader and innovative - big data structure

Cons

- it depends on people you end up working with (some teams are more remote, others are more always thinking of work up and you may get notifications at 3am, others are more chill and so on). You have to ask with which team you'll end up working and meet them. - some projects may be vowed to failure but as upper management is pushing you have to do it even if you don't believe in it - close to impossible to negotiate the pay outside the evaluation process ; personally I am below what I could get on the market (but I stay for personal reasons) - the matrix and the 360 evaluation system is actually a trap for people that don't especially make friends in the office. You think it helps your progress but for people that have a life after work you don't know a lot of people from work (because work is as you guess it only work) and then during the evaluation process people that make lots of connections have better evaluations - the big data part is kind of a protected kingdom and it is very difficult to enter in it. The idea is that big data is the source of income of Criteo and so the closer you get to that the greater is your power in the company but this is less and less true and other people should be valued as such because at the moment people working in non-big data areas are not valued as much.

avatar
Criteo Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to sit and share such detailed feedback. First, we are happy you're feeling part of a dynamic company at Criteo. We believe our people are our most precious asset and that is why we have made Employee well-being our top priority lately. We regret you feel there are differences in treatment depending on your area of expertise. We work hard to deliver a seamless work experience and the best working conditions possible for all. We encourage you to give feedback in the Annual Manager Performance Survey or contact your People Business Partner in HR to share your thoughts and doubts. It is important for us to encourage an open feedback culture, so thank you for sharing your experience and making suggestions.
2.0
Feb 14, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Criteo is tech focused and the engineers are the stars here. * The management is somewhat open to change * Company values diversity * OK compensation * Very good work life balance * Paid overtime * Varied tech stack (c#, java, scala, kotlin, python, ruby) so you'll find a match * OK place to start your career

Cons

Coming from a FAANG company due to family reasons, I was shocked at the diversity of engineer skills here. You can see one skilled and enthusiastic engineer, and a staff/senior engineer that shouldn't even be hired as an intern. Though rarely, I've also encountered people in high tech positions that don't speak English very well. It's a mixed bag. The company is very bureaucratic and slow; even small projects require several meetings in which some people's opinions matter more than others. The kickoff meetings are a joke, people just want to state things to sound smart and they block you in the process. The codebase is very low quality, there's no coding standard, and the high number of supported languages doesn't help. When a feature is replaced, the old code doesn't get deleted, the migrations don't get done to completion, and the code grows and grows over time, becoming more fragile at each iteration. Then you find yourself reading code that's not even used anymore, because it turns out that the code you're reading was there just to support one project that prevented some migration from going complete in 2018 and it was decommissioned in 2020, but no one bothered to clean it up. If you're coming from FAANG, don't make same the mistake I've made. Your skills won't be appreciated here and you'll struggle trying to be productive.

avatar
Criteo Response
3y
Hi, my name is Maxime Brugidou, Engineering Director. Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback. I am sorry to hear you are not making the most out of your experience with us though. We highly promote a bottom-up approach and open feedback culture, so we can fix problems as we go. We strongly encourage innovation internally, with initiatives such as 10% projects, or the Voyager program. Project management is an area of constant improvement, and we are determined to make processes quicker and smoother as we evolve. The Kick-off process, for instance, is constantly improving - there is even a guild dedicated to this process (with a healthy mix of ICs, leads, managers, TPMs, etc.) We also intend for the process to be largely asynchronous - most of the discussion should have already happened in Confluence before the meeting even takes place. If you feel the process is too slow, perhaps getting involved in the guild could be a smart way to help improve it. We are a large engineering organization, with a diverse codebase, and a mix of legacy along with new stacks that we have to maintain. We acknowledge that the quality may vary from one project to the other, as we must keep making pragmatic trade-offs. We do focus on cleaning and deleting old projects, and actively reducing debt across the organization. I can assure you this is something top management is aware of and supports. Our people come from all over the world, so I guess encountering various accents and speaking levels is part of the deal. We see diversity as a real strength, and we are proud of the hiring bar we work with to ensure we hire the best people around the globe. We are constantly challenging and improving our hiring and performance evaluation processes to hire and retain the best diverse engineers while remaining people-centric and providing growth opportunities.
4.0
Feb 13, 2022

Great place to work

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Full of great/easy-to-work people Multi-cultural environment Company cares about employees well-being and work-life balance

Cons

Criteo doesn't really care people leaving after couple of years, no effort spend on keeping employees in the company. Company loses lots of knowledge and expertise due to retention. Employees encouraged to move internally with "Criteo First" idea but positions are filled with external hires often.

avatar
Criteo Response
3y
We are glad to hear you appreciate our initiatives to enhance employee well-being. We care for our employees and are committed to making them grow and thrive during their time with us. Since you wrote this comment, Criteo First program has been reshaped to best support employees. We have invested over the past years to promote internal mobility through our Voyager program; an initiative allowing employees to explore various areas of expertise and teams so they can find the right fit. We have reinforced Individual Development Plan (IDP) since 2021 to train managers and involve them more in their team members' growth.
Viewing 634 - 636 of 1,434 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,196 Criteo reviews submitted anonymously by Criteo employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Criteo is right for you.