Dow reviews

3.9

72% would recommend to a friend

(3,435 total reviews)
avatar

Jim Fitterling

65% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

Dow has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 3,435 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Dow employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Dec 8, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

compensation and benefits are good Plenty opportunities if you luck out with management that supports you movement

Cons

Poor HR Management which allows my managers to fire employees on the basis of their personal feelings. Corporate disconnected to other sites. Do not live by their own company values. No visibility to Upper management totally disconnected at plant level therefore have no idea of what their assigned plant manager are doing locally. Witnessed employees be ostracized reporting mismanagement or HR issues.

2.0
Jun 25, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For a young-ish PhD in Core R&D, a position in Core R&D's synthesis/catalysis/polymers group (has been called OPO, IMHC, Chem Sci, amongst other things) is an ok job on average, but not great. I will try to briefly summarize the pros and cons. Overall, I am slightly disappointed in Dow's Core R&D; it has potential to be much more than it is, but the potential is lost due to standard corporate America problems. Therefore, it's a great back-up plan (e.g. you can't find anything better): -excellent starting offer (pay) -interesting industrial problems to solve -Dow has been around a long time, and has systems for everything. They are already established, and so not that much time needs to be wasted if you trust in the system (this is also a con) -Dow is good about supporting minorities and groups such as LGBTQ

Cons

-Dow epic-ly fails at co-aligning employee performance with employee rewards (pay raises). The people that rise to the top are always those that play the game the best. Technical performance is 'rewarded', but often the spotlight is stolen by someone else. These sorts of thing are common in corporate america; Dow is on the worse end of it. -Core R&D is not the best place to be right now (recently chopped pretty heavily), and based on trends in the chemical industry, it doesn't look good for the future. The degree to which Dow's businesses value Core R&D varies, but there historically have been complaints. -Midland sucks. It's a good place to live if you want to raise a family, but other than that there isn't much going on in any regards. -although Dow has a good culture in terms of accepting different races/genders/etc..., it has a very narrow personality type. Everyone at Dow is Type A, and Dow employees struggle heavily with doing anything differently than they used to. Dow really struggles with non-conventional solutions and thinking outside of the box. -High-level management change every year or two really undermines overall group performance. -mid-level management (e.g. most people's managers) are usually some combination of ineffectual, impotent, or uncaring. On average I've had a new manager every ~10 months, and not a single one really helped my career much. Some were well intentioned, but constrained by 'rules'. Some didn't care. etc... -When you factor all of these things together, could think that Dow would struggle with talent retention (e.g. keeping high performers versus people who play the game well). This is a well known problem at Dow. It is very common for people to getting industrial training at Dow and then go off to another company where they are more highly valued.

2.0
Nov 25, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Big company allows one to experience vast range of products and technologies - Great training in product development process - Opportunities for professional development such as six-sigma - Wonderful analytical sciences division with all the latest and greatest instrumentation (though everyone is overworked) - Researchers from other departments are willing to help even if they don't know you

Cons

- Lower than average industry salary, does not take into account the cost of living in PA w.r.t HQ in MI The following are for the Adhesive and Functional Material Business (not for broader Dow organization), - Science is almost entirely about trial and error, instead of rigorous application of scientific method. You don't need a PhD to do the kind of work most scientists do - Most projects are minor improvements type - Lack of foresight and courage to pursue innovative research and product ideas - Favoritism and politics in the group even at very low level - Deserving candidates don't get recognized or promoted - Some blatantly took credit for someone else's work - Incompetent management - my manager specifically had utterly inadequate scientific and management aptitude - Don't assign dedicated technicians to all PhDs - Management changes every two years as people hop around within the company, as a result managers don't pursue long term efforts that are necessary for a thriving research organization - Frequent restructuring usually resulting in no tangible benefit

Viewing 16 - 18 of 3,435 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,171 Dow reviews submitted anonymously by Dow employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Dow is right for you.