employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

2020 Foresight

Is this your company?

Worst real estate executive recruitment firm out there - Real Estate Professional 2020 Foresight Employee Review

1.0
Apr 25, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None. At best, their self-promotion hints at professionalism, deep industry relationships, and executive competence. Don't be fooled.

Cons

They will fill up your inbox with half-baked job opportunities at indeterminate companies, won't provide pertinent info relative to the opportunity (name of company, compensation, # of employees, years in business, etc.), and, best of all, when they send out a potentially interesting opportunity, the recruiter and CEO fail to respond to emails or vmails to discuss the roll. And in a contorted bit of quid pro quo, Bob Cavoto regularly sends out blast emails with the resumes and career highlights of people that have presumably paid him to assist in their job search efforts, effectively cold calling his entire address book with one generic email -- usually closing with "because this person is a close friend, there will be no fee associated with the placement." Unfortunately, there is no screening done relative to applicable skills / professional background, so he only serves to tarnish their career accolades and cheapen their employment search. Note: I was not one of these people, nor do I fault them for their efforts, but it's clear that Bob Cavoto is lazy at best and disingenuous at worst. 20/20 Foresight is a sham of an organization, and there are innumerable local and national real estate recruitment firms that are far superior -- it wouldn't take much.

avatar
2020 Foresight Response
2y
We do take a process and organized approach, not a scattered approach, and then revise to client’s needs. Unfortunately, this comment comes from 1 disgruntled employee, using phony profiles to appear to be different people, that was terminated years ago for cause and is now a weak competitor in this field. This process does involve some emailing as we feel that it supplements our out-reach for our clients. We believe our track record with 1,000+ clients and a 93% success rate speaks for itself. Which by the way is the highest in the industry where the standard is 65%. We have literally hundreds of thankful references for our company and service. Upon request we will give you 50+ references just in this past year alone.

Explore other reviews about 2020 Foresight

5.0
Mar 10, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall, I have had a positive experience here. Everyone is super nice, approachable and always willing to help out. The work itself isn't frivolous and it feels meaningful. I like that you can see clearly how the work being done impacts the company.

Cons

None that I can think of right now. The working structure is very independent and it is a work from home/virtual set up. More face to face time might be nice for more employee interactions, but I do enjoy not having to commute to the office everyday.

1.0
Feb 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None - proceed with great caution as a candidate and client side. Confidentially and discretion is not a word in 20/20's dictionary

Cons

Blast emails featuring “senior” talent without context or targeted outreach is not executive search — it’s volume-based recruiting dressed up as something more sophisticated. I’m sure the predictable rebuttal will point to self-promotional awards and industry recognition, but in the high-end U.S. CRE search market, reputation is built on discretion, precision, and results — not marketing. My experience has been consistent: inboxes flooded with vague, half-baked opportunities at unnamed firms, with little to no detail on compensation, team size, capitalization, track record, or reporting structure. And when an opportunity actually appears interesting, follow-up disappears. Emails and voicemails go unanswered — by both the recruiter and the supposed hiring executive. More troubling is the recurring practice of blasting out resumes and career summaries of senior professionals to an entire contact list, often framed as a favor with “no fee attached.” That’s not advocacy — it’s indiscriminate distribution. There appears to be minimal screening for fit, which ultimately undermines the very professionals being marketed and dilutes the seriousness of their candidacy. To be clear, I don’t fault the candidates. But that approach does them a disservice and erodes trust in the process. There are many reputable local and national real estate search firms that operate with rigor, discretion, and true executive-level standards. The difference in quality is not subtle.

avatar
2020 Foresight Response
5mo
Hi, I’m the “Bob” (Founder of 20/20 Foresight) referred to in this review. I question the identity of the person posting this review as no such Vice President has left our New York office within the past year or years. However, we take seriously ALL feedback to constantly improve our businesses. The review infers that our recruiting model is different in a negative way from other firms. We are different! We view our recruiting business and our Friends of the Firm/Executive Marketing business as different from the clubby, at times stuffy legacy firms holding on to the same processes and procedures of 30+ years ago. Why? · We have invested heavily in technology ($2M+ over the last three years) across several key areas: a proprietary database of companies, executives, and candidates — which we believe stands alongside LinkedIn as one of the strongest databases in the industry — a proprietary CRM platform customized to support the needs of our clients and our business model, and, beginning three years ago, a focused investment in AI. While it required nearly two years to fully refine, these tools now meaningfully enhance our processes and workflows. · In parallel, we have built a robust email marketing and analytics infrastructure that allows us to operate at scale, measure engagement with precision, and continuously optimize our outreach strategies. Collectively, these capabilities contribute directly to stronger outcomes for both our clients and our recruiters. · The tech has provided us with greater market knowledge and greatly improved the quality and speed of our service which has led to success for our clients and us. Our retained recruiting company has grown to being #1 in real estate, #5 in finance and in the top 10 in other industries with recognition from numerous independent organizations. · None of the above has compromised the most important part of our business; human touch and understanding the client goals and delivering results. Now for specific comments on the review: · The review states: “Here’s a sharper, more controlled version that keeps the edge but reads more credible and intentional”, this statement appears to be written by a bot or AI. · “Blast emails featuring “senior” talent without context or targeted outreach is not executive search — it’s volume-based recruiting dressed up as something more sophisticated” With the use of our database and AI they are targeted and have relevant content. Better tech, better results. And if it takes volume to get the job done for our clients, targeted volume works as exemplified by our results! · “And when an opportunity actually appears interesting, follow-up disappears. Emails and voicemails go unanswered — by both the recruiter and the supposed hiring executive”. Our firm like most others have policies that require follow-up with interested companies and candidates by our consultants. However, do we have lapses like other firms, of course we do. And when that happens, we admit our mistakes and try to do better. · “More troubling is the recurring practice of blasting out resumes and career summaries of senior professionals to an entire contact list, often framed as a favor with no fee attached. That’s not advocacy — it’s indiscriminate distribution.” This is referring to our Friends of the Firm/Executive Marketing Program. With the use of our database and AI they are targeted. Again, better tech, better results. And if it takes volume to get the job done for our clients, targeted volume works. · “To be clear, I don’t fault the candidates. But that approach does them a disservice and erodes trust in the process.” Results matter: we place 400+ and 100+ Friends of the Firm/Executive Marketing executives worldwide. With database and AI, we have a 90%+ success rate. Most legacy firms have a 50% to 65% success rate. Better training, better tech, better results for our clients. · “There are many reputable local and national real estate search firms that operate with rigor, discretion, and true executive-level standards. The difference in quality is not subtle.” We agree that there are good firms out there, but there aren’t “many” that have the database and AI we do. Why? Most medium sized to smaller firms won’t/can’t make the investment in Tech (either stuck in their old ways, don’t have the money, or when things get hard, they quit) and training and are tied to the OLD WAYS of doing things. Because of advanced tech and AI, the recruiting business is evolving at warp speed. Either keep pace to client needs or perish. We think our client relationships are better than most. Why, we’re successful for our clients. Finally, my comments were written without the use of AI. Thanks.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All