Evolving workplace - Anonymous employee ADP Employee Review

4.0
Mar 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Industry leader for payroll processing. Hybrid 3/2 provides the perfect balance between quiet days to concentrate and crank out work while also having the benefits of in-office innovation.

Cons

Pay doesn't support rent/housing costs in high cost areas (NY, NJ, CA). Fully remote is proving to be problematic and a business strain (unless for an accomodation or religious reason). Too many fully-remote colleagues are phoning it in. They don't turn their cameras on and are always on mute in meetings. This dynamic leaves in-office members taking on more (commuting time, costs, being the face of the team), without recognition and visibility. It adds unnecessary strain for in-office workers to constructively challenge ideas and strategize improvements. It's frustrating when fully remote workers take advantage, using it as childcare, while having little empathy for hybrid workers with dangerous travel or sick days that they have to balance.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great job and learned a lot

Cons

Work life balance/ lot of hours

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All