employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged Employer

Good company for those with degrees. - R&D Technician Agilent Technologies Employee Review

4.0
Dec 23, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

flexible hours unless your are production. profit sharing if ROI is good. if they decide to purchase another large company forget it. most coworkers are intelligent and helpful. some management good and understanding when you have small children, others don't care and leave theirs in daycare for awful long time and expect you to also. cafeteria with breakfast and lunch and gym at main site. ok benefits healthcare high or higher deductible plans. fmla available I had 2 mangers the first was good and the second not so much

Cons

you can have more than one phd you are working for at once and they both expect you to be full time for them. they only give a few raises within a group and it's only like 1 or 2 percent so after the increase cost of benefits you're lucky if you got anything. they change your job function to something you didn't sign up for

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
Jul 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As everyone says in the reviews, the rank and file employees are generally great to work with and are highly competent. The company has a cool history in Silicon Valley.

Cons

-Comments on this site about the deterioration in the culture since the CEO transition are true. It's changed from collaborative to combative. -Priority projects get outsize funding but go nowhere. For example, a year was spent overhauling the main website, only to unveil a new one that is substantially worse if not an outright embarrassment (complete with graphics borrowed from the early 2000s). -Layoffs happen semi-regularly, with many jobs cut permanently and others transferred to countries in Asia with cheap labor. -Leadership believes in a "superstar" philosophy, giving huge sums of compensation to a select few hires they think can transform their business (only for them to flop within several months). -Communication is poor. Enterprise communications is led by someone with no self awareness (Dunning-Kruger effect). CEO communications are stilted and filled with corporate jargon nonsense about "transformation." -Stock has failed to gain despite two years of investment and cost cutting. Meanwhile, competitors like Waters continue to make gains and pose a threat to the company's market share. -Lost an important IP case that will likely result in loss of market share in one of their fastest-growing businesses (all of this is public, just Google it). -C-suite leadership is often distant and remote. Rarely mingle with employees.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All