employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged Employer

Far from perfect - Manufacturing Chemist Agilent Technologies Employee Review

3.0
Sep 30, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Above average pay for the area/industry Good coworkers, younger workforce Overtime is consistent and plentiful Reliable job, plant won’t be closing anytime soon. New jobs coming soon with plant addition. Flexible time off hours

Cons

Some of the most blatant nepotism I’ve ever seen in the industry here. Promotions are unclear and are “vibe” based (if they like you). Not based on competency as an operator or individual skill/merit it seems. Very reactive work environment/lack of accountability from other departments in handling situations. Everyone has a “well that’s your problem” mentality that really slows down productivity. Engineering is one of the biggest offenders of this.

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
Jul 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As everyone says in the reviews, the rank and file employees are generally great to work with and are highly competent. The company has a cool history in Silicon Valley.

Cons

-Comments on this site about the deterioration in the culture since the CEO transition are true. It's changed from collaborative to combative. -Priority projects get outsize funding but go nowhere. For example, a year was spent overhauling the main website, only to unveil a new one that is substantially worse if not an outright embarrassment (complete with graphics borrowed from the early 2000s). -Layoffs happen semi-regularly, with many jobs cut permanently and others transferred to countries in Asia with cheap labor. -Leadership believes in a "superstar" philosophy, giving huge sums of compensation to a select few hires they think can transform their business (only for them to flop within several months). -Communication is poor. Enterprise communications is led by someone with no self awareness (Dunning-Kruger effect). CEO communications are stilted and filled with corporate jargon nonsense about "transformation." -Stock has failed to gain despite two years of investment and cost cutting. Meanwhile, competitors like Waters continue to make gains and pose a threat to the company's market share. -Lost an important IP case that will likely result in loss of market share in one of their fastest-growing businesses (all of this is public, just Google it). -C-suite leadership is often distant and remote. Rarely mingle with employees.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All