employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

American Red Cross

Is this your company?

Disaster Program Manager - Disaster Program Manager American Red Cross Employee Review

2.0
Nov 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission, lots of people who care about clients and our communities. Incredible volunteers.

Cons

Hours of driving (5-15 hour avg per week). Not enough people, resources, offices, vehicles to carry out the expectations National HQ has given the public and our communities. This creates a heavy burden on Disaster Program Managers since we are who the community sees. Program mandates keep expanding or require more people and resources keep getting cut. Unsustainably high turnovers, frequent structural changes. Incredibly high work hour demands (60-90 per week). Systems and structures aren't volunteer-friendly and no reasonable support exists to help volunteers or to soothe the frustrations over...except the DPMs/very few employees in the field. No support departments will be there to support you if you aren't in a major metro area. Even if you are a Disaster Program Manager, you are expected to be responsible to do work for everything from IT, HR, to the janitor if you are in a rural area. It's impossible to keep up with.

Explore other reviews about American Red Cross

5.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My experience working with the Red Cross has been great. The work is fulfilling and the people are passionate. Benefits are good - Kaiser is $6 a month!

Cons

There is work life balance, but there is an expectation to work nights and weekends.

3.0
Jul 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Meaningful, mission-driven work that makes a real impact in people's lives during times of crisis. -Flexible remote work when not actively responding to disasters. -Volunteers are the heart of the organization. Many are passionate, dedicated, and genuinely enjoyable to work with. -Building strong relationships with volunteers creates an incredible support system. Many go above and beyond to help staff because they recognize the workload and truly care about the mission. -Unique opportunities to gain experience in disaster response, emergency management, crisis management, leadership, and volunteer management. -Deployment opportunities that provide exceptional professional and personal growth. -Every day is different, offering a wide variety of experiences and continuous learning. -Strong sense of teamwork and camaraderie during disaster operations.

Cons

-Inconsistent accountability for poor leadership and management behaviors. -Toxic relationship dynamics that overlook behaviors. -High burnout and chronic turnover; many employees do not remain beyond two years. -Unsustainable workload paired with unrealistic expectations. -Leadership often prioritizes metrics over employee well-being and long-term program sustainability. -Staff are frequently expected to fill operational gaps caused by declining volunteer capacity instead of receiving additional staffing support. -On-call responsibilities can feel like being available 24/7. Even when not officially on call, staff often receive calls from volunteers needing guidance, assistance finding disaster responders, or language support. -Employees who speak a second language are frequently relied upon across multiple territories for translation assistance without corresponding workload adjustments. Although translation services exist, using them is often discouraged, placing additional burden on bilingual staff. -PTO can be difficult to fully utilize because work continues to accumulate and responsibilities often remain waiting upon return. -Compensation does not reflect the workload, level of responsibility, or work-life sacrifices expected. Salaried employees often work well beyond 40 hours without additional compensation. - Recognition and incentives appear to be uneven across departments, while frontline disaster relief staff often carry significant operational demands with limited comparable rewards. -Diversity is more visible in entry-level and lower management roles than in senior leadership.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All