Senior Quality Analyst - Senior Quality Analyst Amgen Employee Review

4.0
Apr 30, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amgen has a very talented workforce that is committed to quality & safety. They offer part cutting edge technologies in their search for life saving therapies. You are constantly learning and growing at Amgen if you are able to stay plugged in.

Cons

Mentoring and teaching opportunities mentioned above, are not typically provided to contract employees in most departments. Unfortunately, the majority of Amgen staff is now made up of contract employees. The disconnect is becoming more and more evident.

Explore other reviews about Amgen

5.0
Jul 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture and benefits (401k)

Cons

Not very nimble with regards to decision making.

3.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company itself is stable and financially strong. Average pay, and nice people to work with. Exposure to Global, Cross-Functional Work 2 automatic weeks of vacation (aka shutdowns).

Cons

1. Large-Scale Layoffs & Offshore Transition: Most of US IT was laid off AFTER transitioning work to India, what I saw: “Five India resources doing what one US resource was doing, if even 25% gets delivered post transition.” This creates: Knowledge gaps / Quality inconsistencies / Overloaded remaining US staff / Loss of institutional knowledge. 2. Long Hours & International Time Zone Burden: EST Employees frequently work: Early morning calls - starting sometimes 2-4am EST and then still required for Late-night calls in PST time (for headquarters) Even weekend and vacation hours required o support global teams — with no additional compensation. This leads to burnout and morale issues. 3. Severe Workload Imbalance Across Teams: This imbalance is a major cultural and leadership blind spot. Some teams: Have large staffing Very little work Operate comfortably - even can hit the gym during work day While others: Work 16+ hours a day Have no hope of additional staffing Are constantly escalated Carry the weight of global programs. 4. Slow Decision-Making & Heavy Bureaucracy Enterprise governance slows: Approvals / Architecture reviews / Intake processes / Cross-functional alignment Even with SOME light Agile adoption, legacy processes dominate. 5. Vendor Dependency Creates Inconsistency - Reliance on large consulting partners leads to: Reduced internal ownership (Funny that Employees do not want ownership, nor to be held accountable when efforts fail or take longer than expected) Competing priorities with inconsistent delivery quality. 6. Organizational Silos & Resistance to Change - Despite modernization: Teams remain siloed with a “This is how we’ve always done it” persists Agile maturity varies widely Process adoption is inconsistent 7. High Visibility = High Pressure Enterprise programs bring: Frequent escalations Constant stakeholder management Pressure to deliver quickly despite reduced resource constraints This environment is not sustainable without strong leadership support.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All