Beware the Minneapolis Water Resiliency Practice Center (WRPC) - Principal Technical Manager Arcadis Employee Review

1.0
Mar 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I liked the location of the office. The projects I worked on in Arcadis North America's Buried Infrastructure Practice Center (BIPC) were interesting. The Skyways of Minneapolis are returning to life!! Walking around the City at lunch time and to and from my car is a delight.

Cons

Please consider this post a 'warning buoy' about the WRPC. Only accept a position there as a short-term pivot to a better opportunity with a better firm. I was sold a bill of goods when hired; told I had a team of four but in reality had one PE (for a while) plus an EIT... then only the EIT. Arcadis expected me to secure projects in the Twin Cities despite having no local talent to do the work, then vilified me for failing to meet their expectations. We did put out proposals, and just as I warned, Arcadis was not hired because we'd have to ship in staff from other cities. The client feedback was exactly as I predicted: literally, "you don't have a team of local talent". After my 40 years of world-wide consulting engineering experience spanning four firms ranging in size from 25-37,000 people, including being an owner of one of those firms, I thought I had seen it all. But the level of incompetence on which WRPC operates day-to-day is unique. WRPC management doesn't listen to someone on the ground with experience, and they don't listen to their potential clients. In addition, for the past 20+ years, I have known the person who previously sat in my chair in WRPC. That person reported the same incompetent leadership before they left Arcadis. This is a systemic problem. At this point, not easily fixable. If the management of the WRPC continues to lead this way, Arcadis should just shut it down now. It's a waste of corporate treasure. The BIPC leadership is near retirement. Unfortunately it shows. Do not expect an interactive relationship. If you can be self-supporting, working in BIPC is okay. But BIPC is is siloed and not welcoming. If you like to work problems collaboratively, BIPC will not be pleasant for you. Also, BIPC staff are very inexperienced. Succession planning clearly did not exist in BIPC.

Explore other reviews about Arcadis

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people and the work we do.

Cons

None really. Could use better pay consistencies and recognition of those who do well and are rewarded as such.

1
avatar
Arcadis Response
3w
We appreciate you sharing your experience of the amazing people and values as well as your thoughts on rewards and recognition structure for high performers. At Arcadis, we are committed to creating an environment where people can thrive, and feedback like yours helps us refine our approach so we can better support recognition, growth, and a rewarding employee experience for all team members. Thank you for sharing your experience.
3.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company offers a high degree of flexibility, and the absence of micromanagement creates an environment where employees are trusted to manage their own work. The culture is generally positive, with low toxicity and respectful day‑to‑day interactions. There are many opportunities available, but they are not handed out; employees must actively seek them, and those who take initiative can grow. When you perform well, your work is recognized and you can maintain stability within the organization.

Cons

Favoritism sometimes influences who receives opportunities, and the environment can feel competitive, which may limit fair access to advancement. Some of the most desirable or high‑visibility projects are handled quietly and tend to be given to the same small group of people, creating the sense that access is based more on relationships than performance. In certain cases, employees have even heard comments suggesting a preference for filling roles based on gender, which is inappropriate and legally problematic. Promotion decisions can also be restrictive; for example, some employees are told they cannot be promoted because they would be “too expensive for the field,” a practice that feels both limiting and unfair. The company is not hiring enough field support, which places heavy pressure on senior staff who have no one to delegate to, while existing field staff remain stagnant with few paths forward. Compensation for employees already in the system tends to fall below market standards, and many people find they must leave the company to receive a market‑rate adjustment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All