Low pay, high turnover, bad system, poorly managed - Banking Relationship Specialist Bank OZK Employee Review

1.0
Apr 28, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you like to disappoint customers, you’ll love it here

Cons

Low pay with no bonuses, high turnover, no flexibility due to constantly being short-handed. Simple customer inquiries are complicated due to poor system. Frustrating system that always goes down. Sometimes you have to stay late until the system comes back up. Poor management from the top down. Nobody gets trained to advance in their role.

avatar
Bank OZK Response
5y
Providing Excellent Customer Service is part of our DNA. We believe that our amazing employees, leveraging our evolving technology and focusing on continuous innovation and improvement help us to maximize the experience of each customer. We believe that providing competitive compensation, benefits and a dynamic culture has contributed to our being named as a “Best Places to Work” employer and a best national and globally performing bank in the nation. We truly value the contributions of all of our employees by embracing teamwork, collaboration and diversity, in all of its forms, recognizing that our potential together far exceeds the sum of our potential individually. This is the OZK Way! - Cindy Wolfe: Chief Banking Officer

Explore other reviews about Bank OZK

5.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits, decent pay, decent people

Cons

There are many departments with poor, toxic leadership and abusing their authority

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and a stable paycheck. There are people here doing genuinely strong work and trying to build things the right way. Some leaders are approachable and mean well.

Cons

Concerns get heard but rarely resolved. You'll get a warm, sympathetic response and then nothing changes. If you raise the same issue again, you get the same warm response again. Job responsibilities tend to grow well past what the role is classified and paid for, with no adjustment in title or compensation to match. Being direct or setting boundaries about workload gets read as a personality problem instead of a legitimate concern. Compensation doesn't always reflect the level of work being done, especially compared to peers doing similar jobs. There's no meaningful career path or growth programming. Something I didn't know before joining, and wish I had, is that the headquarters is essentially an art museum, the bank owns a private collection and gives tours of the building. It's a striking level of investment in physical spaces. In hindsight, that would have prompted me to ask more pointed questions in my interview about employee development and career growth, because that same level of investment doesn't extend to training programs or growth paths for staff. If you're interviewing here, ask specifically what career progression looks like and what's budgeted for employee development, not just what the office looks like.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All