RUN!!!! - Anonymous employee Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
Feb 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Really sad to see the transformation that B&V has undergone. Heartbreaking to think about where this company was only a few short years ago. The optimism, sense of ownership, self accountability, and comradery was in such a great place. Unfortunately, that has really changed over the last few years and the culture has really flipped upside down.

Cons

High performers are leaving and taking folks with them. The company cannot backfill positions fast enough and folks are feeling overloaded and undersupported. Many people no longer feel connected to the work they do or the impact it makes, they are just trying to make sure they scan their badge in and out with enough time in between so they don't get in trouble for not meeting the return to office mandates and they end up on the reports the company runs to track employees. Feels as though people are just trying to not do anything too go so they don't end up getting more work piled on them and don't do anything too bad so as to just not get fired. Really sad to see!

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
5mo
We are sorry to hear about your experience. We wish you the best in your career.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All