You're only the money machine maker for the company - Business Consultant Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
Jun 22, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

BV has several good benefits and vacations. Administration staff are very nice and helpful.

Cons

When I joined this company, I really take a full pride with my job, my company, and my responsibilities. However, often times there were no communication between the upper management and the employees about the performance or expectation in goal setting. Worst of all, we are told to work as much as we can and put about average 45-50 hours, or else you will be fired. Black & Veatch should change their mission value to "Charge our Clients as much as we can while contributing small values for the client." Many employees got laid off after they have finished first or second project. This is very sad. Later on, they hired many fresh graduates that have little or no experience whatsoever and charging their client as much as they can for "high-school" work like filling excel sheet, etc.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All