So Much for Work/Life Balance - Manager Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
Dec 5, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

After working here almost 20 years, I used to have a lot of positive things to say. One of the best things used to be the ability to have a good work/life balance.

Cons

The CEO just issued a mandate that all employees return to the office for at least 3 days a week after being told two years ago that we would be permanently remote. Based on that, many employees made significant life changes (selling/buying homes, selling a car, etc). Reasons cited were that employees indicated they wanted to return to the office. The few times I did go back to the office once they opened back up, I saw fewer than 10 employees the entire day. That tells me the don't really want to return to the office. They could have started doing that over a year ago if they really wanted to. Many I know have already started looking for new jobs. I will be joining them in that endeavor. I had hoped to end my career here but not at this cost. There's absolutely no reason for most of the mobile workers to commute just to go to the office and do exactly the same thing we would be doing at home.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3y
Thank you for writing a review. Your feedback is important to us and leadership. As you know, we have made some recent announcements and changes to continue to evolve our hybrid work policy. We will continue to monitor and transform our policy as we move forward.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All