New CEO Reneges on Working in New Ways, Hates Work/life Balance - Anonymous employee Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
Dec 5, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working here the past year was a great experience, I loved the flexibility and autonomy working from home gave me to accomplish my job. I felt trusted and valued, and now that is sadly all thrown away.

Cons

I was hired a year ago with the promise of being a remote employee, and the newly-minted CEO is now instituting a major reduction of employee quality of life, including the former Working in New Ways policy that allows flexibility, freedom, and autonomy. The new policy will soon require everyone to report to their closest office within 75 miles, which is much too far to drive, especially for those driving through densely populated cities with horrific traffic. I feel lied to and cheated out of what could have been a long career here, now I have to find a way to spin a year-long stint on my resume to prospective employers who actually value their workforce.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We recognize our new hybrid policy is a change for our employees. As you know, we have already made adjustments to our policy and are continuing to listen as we move forward.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All