Do not come work here. Don’t even interview. We are suffering. - Anonymous employee Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
Dec 11, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Big company, nice office buildings

Cons

Where to start. Black & Veatch is the most two faced company I’ve ever worked for. They preach being “employee owned”. But when a major change comes they don’t listen to employees and do what’s best to line their pockets. New CEO Mario making changes he promised to leave alone. Trying to make Black & Veatch more like other companies. They promised work flexibility but now they are forcing everyone back to the office. Several employees were denied raises and bonuses over the past year because they were given the luxury of working from home. Now being forced to come into the office again without having a raise. Mandatory covid vaccines soon coming too. Don’t leave your current company to come here for greener pastures. It’s not going to be better. Company is experiencing high turn over. You will be swamped with projects the day you start. Stay away

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3y
We are not currently mandating a COVID-19 vaccine. As we always have, we will do our best to support all of our professionals.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture, flexibility, benefits and pay.

Cons

I do not have any. Great place to work.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All