How I Lost a Company in My First 100-Days by Mario Azar - Senior Manager Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
Jan 6, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Things have changed so much under the new CEO, it is difficult to think of any.

Cons

The company made an agreement with employees that we could work in new ways under an anytime, anywhere, anyplace approach to getting work done. The prior leadership told its employees that the change was permanent. The new CEO, Mario Azar, blatantly lies to his employees. At a town hall when being introduced by the old CEO, Mario said working in new ways would not be changed (it is on tape for all the company to see), then within his first 100-days he takes it away. In a meeting with department heads he said (in a whining type voice) the buildings were not meant to be empty, but the reality was B&V was downsize and selling off expensive office space lowering our largest overhead cost, which now going backwards will hurt our profitability. Mario was touting that we have to protect the B&V brand, well Mario you just killed it. It will be nearly impossible to recruit people in an already resource constrained environment.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3y
As a 20+ year veteran of our company, we thank you for speaking up and leaving a review. It's understanding that our new hybrid work environment has been a tough change and we are continuing to help our professionals navigate it. Also, thank you for your recruiting concerns, but we're continuing to recruit strong candidates and our recruiting team is ready to continue finding amazing professionals! We appreciate your insight and honest feedback.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All