CEO/HR told all employees to add positive reviews here - Project Manager Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
Feb 26, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The variety of work here can be very interesting. My co workers are bright and talented. Before new CEO I looked at BV as place you could spend your entire career. I have pointed my engineering student daughter toward Burns & McD.

Cons

Being threatened! All hands meeting we were told to review BV positively on 3rd party sights and also told BV has purchased a service to look for negative reviews. So watch out! When Mario was asked in the meeting how we will measure the effectiveness of the Return To Office mandate Mario said... 'How about those stock prices!!!' Refusal to answer questions, ignoring employees concerns, stating those who don't want to return are 'vocal minority! And stating those who speak out against RTO are disrespectful. This has become a horrible place to work since the beloved Steve Edwards retired. HR and leaders will simply state, 'people are happy' when the misery of their employees are on clear display in front of them. Waiting for it.... The new marketing professional will respond to this review with gaslighting statements.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture, flexibility, benefits and pay.

Cons

I do not have any. Great place to work.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All