2nd Review since Return to Office (RTO) was announced. Good place for a job, bad place for a career - Electrical Engineer 4 Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
Mar 24, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working in New Ways (WINW) during COVID, 9-80 schedule, unlimited sick time for engineers

Cons

Ended up leaving the company due to RTO policy and a poor supervisor. Supervisor has been above me for 6 years and unable to promote anyone underneath him, while securing two promotions himself. Held my career hostage, and now my former team's careers, while not consulting us on our desired career paths. Was told I was too valuable to promote . Saw no growth or development over 6 years. Bad leads and supervisors tend to get promoted based on who they know not their capabilities.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3y
Thank you again for your second review since our hybrid model went into effect. As a former employee, we still value you sharing your personal thoughts and we wish you the best in your future endeavors.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture, flexibility, benefits and pay.

Cons

I do not have any. Great place to work.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All