BV Culture In Ruins under Azar’s ‘Leadership’ - Anonymous employee Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
May 4, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Diversity of offerings to our clients positions BV well for weathering recessions.

Cons

By far the most significant downside to working at BV is the lack of effective leadership from new CEO, Mario Azar. In less than a year, Azar has dismantled the incredibly positive and “shared ownership” mindset that previous CEO’s Len Rodman and Steve’s Edwards worked so hard to foster among the employee-owners. Gone are the days of feeling connected to our leaders and feeling inspired to share in their vision of moving the company forward, because frankly Azar has worked to move the company backwards, seemingly treating his role as one of the old Partners instead of as CEO of an employee-owned company, affecting a dictatorial leadership style. Clumsy re-organizations, a laughably inept attempt at a Return To Office policy, and deceptive, dismissive, and condescending communication with employee-owners, have all resulted in morale being at an all-time low and many talented employee-owners leaving the company.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3y
We appreciate you leaving a review for us and we're happy to see our diversity of offerings as a pro--we agree! It does indeed help us weather recessions in the future.--as does acquiring new companies! Just a mere 7 days ago we announced a new addition to the Black & Veatch family of companies--Bird Electric Enterprises. Mario is working hard to carry the vision of moving us forward and we're thrilled for what it means for us! Thanks again for your feedback.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All