Poor Upper Management - Electrical Engineer Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
Jan 31, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

job stability; it's hard to get fired. I've seen engineers be unbillable for two years before they were let go.

Cons

Not seeing BVs competitive advantage over local competitors. Upper management is deceptive; new CEO claimed remote work was here to stay then created a mandate to return office mandate. They're implementing a bluetooth system to track employees location within 10 ft of accuracy. This is in the name of 'safety' to alert EMS during emergency but in reality it's being used by HR to enforce return to office mandates.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
2y
Thanks for taking time to share your feedback about our hybrid work and access control system upgrades. For more than a year, we have maintained our hybrid model to give professionals flexibility, and we think it was the right move for our company and our clients. It will ultimately preserve the fabric and culture of Black & Veatch and offers flexibility while building meaningful in-person relationships. The badging enhancement is needed to support our working environment, where professionals are in and out on different days and times. Thanks again for your inputs as we navigate this new working landscape together.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1mo
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All