Run - Financial Analyst Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
Mar 31, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everyone below managers are great to work with.

Cons

To start off, the new CEO has really made the company into a toxic culture. The threats, lies, empty promises. When he took over he told the company he would not change the RTO then a few months later we were required to start coming in three days a week and they told us it would be flexible. Let me tell you it’s not flexible at all. You have to be in office the full eight hours three days a week. If you happen to have something pop up one day, you have to make up your third day. I wouldn’t call that flexible. To make matters even worse, they are now making us wear a tracker on our badges! Saying it’s for “safety” purposes. Talk about not trusting your employees? All this is doing is stressing out people and making people unhappy.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
2y
Thanks for sharing your views with us. We recognize the move to our hybrid work model more than a year ago was challenging for some professionals. Black & Veatch believes it was important to provide its professionals with flexibility while also enabling the benefits of in-person office collaboration. Navigating this new working model has brought challenges and opportunities. The access control system enhancements are crucial to the safety of our professionals and ensure that first responders have critical safety information during an emergency. The safety and health of employees, clients, and contractors is a Black & Veatch core value, and we have been working on these upgrades as part of our technology roadmap for several years. Again, we appreciate your feedback, and we’ll be sure to share your sentiments.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture, flexibility, benefits and pay.

Cons

I do not have any. Great place to work.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All