Long Hours- Great Learning Opportunities- No Managerial Oversite - EMS General Business Consultant Black & Veatch Employee Review

2.0
May 24, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was hired to work in a BV office . It was a major change for me but I've learned more here than I have at any of my other jobs. Although I've never been extended an offer, there are wonderful opportunities to travel the world. I like working on various types of projects and client facing. Can be a great experience under the right leadership.

Cons

Where to start.... Long Hours/ Little Oversight to Management in Regional Offices (please don't get stuck with a micro manager like I have) there is no mechanism to report bad Project Manager's/ The regional offices always operate in Crisis mode/ High turn over (3 other people sat in my seat within 3 years and my supervisor just left a couple months ago.)/ Even though you landed the job at B&V, now you need to look for work to do, I spent plenty of time pitching my ability to work on projects to Project Managers, it kept me "billable"( or as I'd like to say "having a job-able"), but who should have to search for their own work? That's why I came to you B&V. If I wanted to be my own agent I would have started my own business. You may as well search for a new Job or start your own. Their review process is grueling it takes hours to fill out these forms, just for them to tell you that you are doing a satisfactory job. The working environment in this regional office sucks, I never got to see the office environment before they hired me (I'll never do that again). It's extremely stressful working.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture, flexibility, benefits and pay.

Cons

I do not have any. Great place to work.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All