employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Blood Cancer United

Engaged Employer

Community & Fund Development Coordinator - Community & Fund Development Coordinator Blood Cancer United Employee Review

1.0
Nov 20, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For Canadian branches, you receive immediate medical benefits upon employment. Salaries are competitive within the non-profit industry. Some employees really care about the cause and the people they serve.

Cons

This is for Canadian branches: -Branches are micro-managed by head office -Endless (mostly useless) meetings from head office to push fundraising campaigns -Often treated as though you are incompetent from head office -Feeling of "money first" (not people first); aggressive fundraising techniques -Heavy pressure from management & head office if you're not reaching fundraising targets -Large events required a lot of overtime, but management put large amounts of pressure to reduce overtime which causes a lot of stress -Very stressful working environment, lots of pressure from management -Very disorganized management -VERY HIGH TURNOVER. Felt like every other week somebody was leaving the organization -Very poor, old-fashioned types of fundraising programs that no longer work. However, head office continues to push them, even when national fundraising dollars reflect that these programs are no longer working -Very poor office environment: not much social time or team-building -TOO MANY MANAGERS. Some branches had upwards of 5 managers, but only 1 admin person. Everyone at head office seemed to be a manager of some type -Business structure did not make sense. Too much management and not a lot of productive work -Certain employees were very rude, passive-aggressive and often nasty to branch employees. Management was aware but never seemed to do anything about it. Unsure how these people kept their jobs

Explore other reviews about Blood Cancer United

5.0
May 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission of organization Mission Leadership Pay commensurate with experience

Cons

Non-mission leadership is struggling a bit, but will hopefully find their way.

1.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours (but with the implementation of meeting metrics, poor schedule). Great time off and benefits.

Cons

The mission is inspiring, but employee well-being often feels secondary to organizational demands. Chronic understaffing, high turnover, and frequent organizational changes create an environment where employees are expected to take on responsibilities far beyond their job descriptions. Workloads can become unsustainable, particularly during campaign seasons, leading to burnout and low morale. Goals and budget expectations are often aggressive and may not reflect local market realities or available resources. Employees are held accountable for outcomes that can be heavily influenced by factors outside of their control, while support and staffing do not always keep pace with expectations. Communication and transparency from leadership could be improved. Decisions affecting employees are sometimes made without meaningful input from those doing the day-to-day work, and organizational restructuring can create uncertainty and instability. Many talented and passionate employees leave because they feel overworked, undervalued, and unsupported despite their dedication to the mission. While working at a regional office, there was strong lack of trust towards the national office from all of the employees.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All