A 'safe' place to build your resume for entry/mid level consultants. - Senior Consultant CGI Employee Review

4.0
Feb 3, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's a good place to start off and build entry and mid level experience. Generally flexible work schedules allow for reasonable work/life balance. Pay is fair but not extraordinary. Company has experienced steady growth and is generally stable/safe place to work. I work in an excellent but small group within the broader company. There are pockets of greatness and some areas of weakness/mediocrity. If you are looking for a job here, shop around within CGI carefully.

Cons

Difficult to move beyond mid-level management. Not much opportunity to do work 'outside the mold' or take risks. Pay is not very competitive, especially in the DC metro area.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All